Conference Coverage

Apixaban prevails in study of 163,000 DOAC users

 

Key clinical point: Apixaban outperformed rivaroxaban and dabigatran in safety and efficacy.

Major finding: The risk of stroke/systemic embolism in apixaban-treated patients was 31% lower than in those on dabigatran and 27% lower than with rivaroxaban.

Study details: This retrospective, observational study based upon claims data included 162,707 propensity score-matched patients with atrial fibrillation on a direct oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention.

Disclosures: The ongoing ARISTOPHANES study is sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. The presenter reported serving as a consultant to Pfizer and receiving research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Portola.

Source: Deitelzweig SB. ACC 2018.


 

REPORTING FROM ACC 2018

– Apixaban outperformed both rivaroxaban and dabigatran in a retrospective, observational study of real-world prescribing of direct oral anticoagulants in nearly 163,000 U.S. patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, Steven B. Deitelzweig, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

This ongoing study, known as ARISTOPHANES (Anticoagulants for Reduction in Stroke: Observational Pooled Analysis on Health Outcomes and Experience of Patients), is the largest real-world analysis of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to date. Unlike most of the previous observational studies of DOACs, which used a single insurance claims database, ARISTOPHANES pools data from Medicare and four large U.S. commercial insurance claims databases that collectively cover more than 180 million Americans.

Dr. Steven B. Deitelzweig, chair of hospital medicine and vice president of medical affairs at the Oschner Medical Center in New Orlean Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Dr. Steven B. Deitelzweig

In this way, investigators were able to assemble a study population of 162,707 patients on DOACs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation who were propensity score–matched for 30 variables, including demographics and comorbidities, in order to control for potential confounders, explained Dr. Deitelzweig, chair of hospital medicine and vice president of medical affairs at the Oschner Medical Center, New Orleans.

This was a study of real-world prescribing. Unlike in randomized trials, where everyone is on a standard-dose DOAC, lower-dose therapy was common. It was prescribed for 21% of patients on apixaban, 15% on dabigatran, and 24% on rivaroxaban.

ARISTOPHANES results

The biggest difference in outcome was between patients on apixaban and those on dabigatran. The incidence of stroke/systemic embolism in 27,096 patients on apixaban (Eliquis) was 1.01% in 360 days, for a statistically significant 31% reduction in risk relative to the 1.42% incidence rate in 27,096 extensively matched patients on dabigatran (Pradaxa). The 360-day incidence of major bleeding was 2.7% in the apixaban group and 3.3% in those on dabigatran, for a 23% relative risk reduction. In the apixaban/rivaroxaban comparison, which included 62,619 patients in each group, the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism was 1.21% with apixaban and 1.42% with rivaroxaban, for a 27% relative risk reduction. Major bleeding occurred in 3.1% of the apixaban group and 5.3% of those on rivaroxaban, for a 46% reduction in risk favoring apixaban.

In a comparison of 27,538 patients on dabigatran and an equal number of rivaroxaban, the 360-day cumulative incidence of stroke/systemic embolism was 1.40% with dabigatran versus 1.23% with rivaroxaban, while the major bleeding rate was 3.28% in the dabigatran group and 4.76% with rivaroxaban.

Dr. Deitelzweig was quick to acknowledge the major limitation of ARISTOPHANES.

“Only associations can be drawn from a nonrandomized, retrospective, observational study, not conclusions regarding causality, even though the cohorts were matched using propensity scoring,” he emphasized.

Pages

Next Article:

VIDEO: PFO closure device 100% effective against future strokes

Related Articles