From the Journals

Rituximab may outperform some other first-line multiple sclerosis treatments

 

Key clinical point: Patients with newly diagnosed RRMS may discontinue rituximab less often than they do other disease-modifying treatments.

Major finding: Rituximab-treated patients had significantly lower rates of discontinuation, compared with injectable DMTs, fingolimod, natalizumab, and dimethyl fumarate. Relapse rates with rituximab were lower than they were with injectable DMTs and dimethyl fumarate.

Data source: Retrospective cohort study of data from a Swedish multiple sclerosis registry that included 494 patients with a diagnosis of RRMS.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Swedish Medical Research Council, among other sources. Study authors reported conflicts of interest related to Biogen, Novartis, and Genzyme.

Source: Granqvist M et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jan 8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4011


 

FROM JAMA NEUROLOGY

Rituximab was associated with a lower drug discontinuation rate versus all other commonly prescribed disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) used as initial therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in a retrospective study of patient data from a Swedish multiple sclerosis registry.

A diagnosis form says multiple sclerosis. designer491/Thinkstock
Based on those results, rituximab “can be considered an option” for treatment-naive RRMS patients, according to lead author of the study, Mathias Granqvist, MD, of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, and his coauthors.

Anti-CD20 agents such as rituximab are “likely to become an additional treatment option” for RRMS, and off-label use of rituximab for this indication has “increased considerably” in Sweden in recent years, the investigators said. RRMS is not an approved indication for rituximab in the United States, whereas across Sweden “there is no difference in reimbursement policy ... because all DMTs are covered by the national health insurance, including off-label medications.”

The addition of new DMTs for RRMS has changed the treatment landscape recently, although in real-world practice, there is a lack of “detailed knowledge about how to tailor therapy,” the authors said. They noted that the majority of patients discontinue traditional first-line treatment with injectable DMTs (that is, interferon beta and glatiramer acetate) within 2 years, suggesting a need for better treatment options.

To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of rituximab in this setting, Dr. Granqvist and his colleagues selected patient registry data for two Swedish counties that 494 included who received a diagnosis of RRMS between January 1, 2012, and October 31, 2015.

The largest subset of patients (n = 215) received injectable DMTs, while the rest received rituximab (n = 120), dimethyl fumarate (n = 86), natalizumab (Tysabri; n = 50), fingolimod (Gilenya; n = 17), or another treatment (n = 6), according to data in the report.

The proportion of patients who stayed on treatment was significantly higher for rituximab versus all other DMTs, study authors found. Compared with rituximab, the hazard ratios for drug discontinuation after adjusting for covariates and propensity score were 11.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.7-27.4) for injectable DMTs, 15.1 (95% CI, 3.9-58.0) for dimethyl fumarate, 5.9 (95% CI, 1.5-23.4) for fingolimod, and 11.3 (95% CI 3.2-39.4) for natalizumab.

Rituximab-treated patients also had lower rates of clinical relapse, neuroradiologic disease activity, and adverse events, compared with injectable DMTs or dimethyl fumarate, according to the investigators.

In comparison with fingolimod and natalizumab, relapse rates and gadolinium-enhancing lesions with rituximab were less frequent, but the authors said those differences did not reach statistical significance in all analyses.

The study was funded by the Swedish Medical Research Council, among other sources. Study authors reported conflicts of interest related to Biogen, Novartis, and Genzyme.

SOURCE: Granqvist M et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jan 8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4011

Next Article:

FDA cites manufacturer of autologous stem cells for regulatory, manufacturing missteps
   Comments ()

Related Articles