How to bridge the gap for rural cancer patients

A minority of patients (19.4%, n = 7,184) were from rural locations. They were significantly more likely than were urban patients to be 65 years or older (P less than .001) and significantly less likely to be black (vs. all other races; P less than .001).

However, there was no significant between-group differences in sex, and all major U.S. geographic regions (West, Midwest, South, and Northeast) were represented.

The researchers limited their analysis of survival to the first 5 years after trial enrollment to emphasize outcomes related to cancer and its treatment. They looked at overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific survival.

The team found no meaningful difference in OS or cancer-specific survival between rural and urban patients for 16 of the 17 cancer types.

The exception was estrogen receptor-–negative, progesterone receptor–negative breast cancer. Rural patients with this cancer didn’t live as long as did their urban counterparts. The hazard ratio (HR) was 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.51; P = .008) for OS and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04-1.52; P = .02) for cancer-specific survival.