Assessment of IV Edaravone Use in the Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Background: Edaravone has been shown to slow functional degeneration of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The primary objective of this study was to assess ALS disease progression in veterans on IV edaravone compared with veterans who received standard of care.
Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a large, academic US Department of Veteran Affairs medical center. The primary endpoint was the change in baseline Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores after 6 months of IV edaravone compared with standard-of-care ALS management. The secondary outcomes included change in ALSFRS-R scores, percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) and speech intelligibility stage (SIS) 3 to 24 months after initiation of therapy, duration of edaravone completed (months), time to death (months), and safety outcomes.
Results: Twenty-one edaravone and 42 standard-of-care patients were evaluated. No difference was noted in ALSFRS-R at 6 months between the edaravone and standard-of-care groups (P = .84). Additionally, no difference was noted in change from baseline %FVC, change from baseline SIS, and time to death between the 2 groups (P > .05). No safety events were reported in either group.
Conclusions: No difference was noted in the rate of ALS disease progression between patients who received IV edaravone vs standard of care.
Methods
This study was conducted at a large, academic US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Patients with ALS are followed by a multidisciplinary clinic composed of a neurologist, pulmonologist, clinical pharmacist, social worker, speech therapist, physical therapist, occupational therapist, dietician, clinical psychologist, wheelchair clinic representative, and benefits representative. Patients are typically seen for a half-day appointment about every 3 months. During these visits, a comprehensive review of disease progression is performed. This review entails completion of the ALSFRS-R, physical examination, and pulmonary function testing. Speech intelligibility stage (SIS) is assessed by a speech therapist as well. SIS is scored from 1 (no detectable speech disorder) to 5 (no functional speech). All patients followed in this multidisciplinary ALS clinic receive standard-of-care treatment. This includes the discussion of treatment options that if appropriate are provided to help manage a wide range of complications associated with this disease (eg, pain, cramping, constipation, excessive secretions, weight loss, dysphagia). As a part of these personal discussions, treatment with riluzole is also offered as a standard-of-care pharmacologic option.
Study Design
This retrospective case-control study was conducted using electronic health record data to compare ALS progression in patients on IV edaravone therapy with standard of care. The Indiana University/Purdue University, Indianapolis Institutional Review Board and the VA Research and Development Committee approved the study. The control cohort received the standard of care. Patients in the case cohort received standard of care and edaravone 60 mg infusions daily for an initial cycle of 14 days on treatment, followed by 14 days off. All subsequent cycles were 10 of 14 days on treatment followed by 14 days off. The initial 2 doses were administered in the outpatient infusion clinic to monitor for a hypersensitivity reaction. Patients then had a peripherally inserted central catheter line placed and received doses on days 3 through 14 at home. A port was placed for subsequent cycles, which were also completed at home. Appropriateness of edaravone therapy was assessed by the neurologist at each follow-up appointment. Therapy was then discontinued if warranted based on disease progression or patient preference.
Study Population
Patients included were aged 18 to 75 years with diagnosed ALS. Patients with complications that might influence evaluation of medication efficacy (eg, Parkinson disease, schizophrenia, significant dementia, other major medical morbidity) were excluded. Patients were also excluded if they were on continuous bilevel positive airway pressure and/or had a total score of ≤ 3 points on ALSFRS-R items for dyspnea, orthopnea, or respiratory insufficiency. Due to our small sample size, patients were excluded if treatment was < 6 months, which is the gold standard of therapy duration established by clinical trials.9,11,12
The standard-of-care cohort included patients enrolled in the multidisciplinary clinic September 1, 2014 to August 31, 2017. These patients were compared in a 2:1 ratio with patients who received IV edaravone. The edaravone cohort included patients who initiated treatment with IV edaravone between September 1, 2017, and August 31, 2020. This date range prior to the approval of edaravone was chosen to compare patients at similar stages of disease progression and to have the largest sample size possible.
Data Collection
Data were obtained for eligible patients using the VA Computerized Patient Record System. Demographic data gathered for each patient included age, sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), race, and riluzole use.
The primary endpoint was the change in ALSFRS-R score after 6 months of IV edaravone compared with standard-of-care ALS management. Secondary outcomes included change in ALSFRS-R scores 3, 12, 18, and 24 months after therapy initiation, change in %FVC and SIS 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after therapy initiation, duration of edaravone completed (months), time to death (months), and adverse events.
