A Case of Duodenocaval Fistula in the Setting of Respiratory Failure Initially Confused for Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury
Background: A duodenocaval fistula is seen when a connection exists between the duodenum and the inferior vena cava. It is a rare entity that presents a diagnostic challenge due to its nonspecific presenting symptoms and often is found only during a laparotomy or autopsy.
Case Presentation: A 37-year-old man initially presented to the hospital for melena but went into cardiac arrest before undergoing an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Unfortunately, a duodenocaval fistula was only found during the autopsy.
Conclusions: Duodenocaval fistula is a diagnostic challenge as it may present with nonspecific findings concerning for other etiologies. We want to highlight that although rare, duodenocaval fistula should be considered for patients who present with gastrointestinal bleeding and hypoxic respiratory failure.
The most challenging aspect in diagnosing DCF is that many times patients present with nonspecific symptoms, and given its rarity it is not something that is usually at the forefront of most differentials.2 This diagnostic difficulty may elucidate why there is such a relatively high mortality rate—nearly 40%—associated with DCF and why many times accurate diagnosis is not made until autopsy.1,3 The most common presenting manifestations are sepsis and/or GI bleeding; in less than half the cases described in the literature patients had both sepsis and GI bleeding. In our case, the patient had signs of melena but was not felt to be septic as his presenting signs were felt to be in the setting of blood loss and dehydration (given his history of bulimia), not an acute infectious source.
In retrospect, one of the more confounding aspects of this case is the clinical picture concerning for TRALI. The patient required supplemental oxygen throughout his hospitalization and decompensated while or after receiving a transfusion, thus having TRALI on the differential was not felt inappropriate at that time. However, this case also illustrates the power of an anchoring bias, and perhaps the clinical team anchored on the diagnosis of TRALI too quickly before considering other possible etiologies for the patient’s respiratory distress. TRALI can be one of the most challenging diagnoses to make in the field of transfusion medicine as there are no definitive diagnostic criteria.6 It is felt to be a clinical diagnosis of exclusion as there is no pathognomonic sign or diagnostic test to confirm it as the cause of the patient’s respiratory distress, though anti–human leukocyte antigen antibodies commonly are present.6,7 Considering how quickly the patient decompensated on day 2 of hospitalization and the presence of C perfringens bacteremia, which
Conclusions
Our investigation reports a case of a DCF in the setting of significant duodenal peptic ulcer disease. We highlight the diagnostic challenge that this commonly lethal etiology presents. We believe ours is the first case in which it was confused for TRALI and associated with food embolism to the lungs causing hypoxic respiratory failure. We want to highlight that DCF, though rare, should be considered for patients who present with GI bleeding and hypoxic respiratory failure.
