Provider Perceptions of Opioid Safety Measures in VHA Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Centers
Background: A priority for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) leadership is increasing access to lifesaving treatment, particularly naloxone distribution and medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD) for veterans. To date, these practices are not widely done in the VHA emergency departments (ED) and urgent care centers (UCC).
Methods: The goal of this research was to understand advanced care provider perceptions of barriers and facilitators to naloxone distribution or MAT initiation in VHA ED/UCCs. We developed and disseminated a survey to VHA ED and UCC advanced care providers, including medical doctors (MD/DO), physician assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs). Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted.
Results: There was 16.7% response rate (372 out of 2228 providers) from 103 of 132 sites across all VA regions. The top barrier for ED/UCCs providers to both naloxone and MAT initiation was the feeling that it was beyond their scope of practice (35.2% and 53.2%, respectively). Other reported barriers to MAT initiation included unclear follow-up plan and system for referral of care (50.1%) and feeling uncomfortable using MAT medications (28.8%). Top facilitators for prescribing naloxone included pharmacist who could help prescribe/educate the patient on the medication (44.6%) and patient knowledge of medication options to help overdose (31.7%). The top facilitator for MAT initiation from the ED/UCC was additional VA-based same day treatment options (34.9%).
Conclusions: Present findings offer a look into possible challenges to address or opportunities to leverage when considering or developing an ED/UCC-based naloxone distribution or MAT-initiation implementation program in VHA facilities.
Limitations
This survey had a low response rate (16.7%). One potential explanation for the low response rate is that when the survey was deployed, many of the VHA ED/UCC physicians were per-diem employees. Per-diem physicians may be less engaged and aware of site facilitators or barriers to naloxone and MAT prescribing. This, too, may have potentially skewed the collected data. However, the survey did not ask HCPs to disclose their employment status; thus, exact rates of per diem respondents are unknown.
We aimed to capture only self-perceived barriers to prescribing naloxone and MAT in the ED, but we did not capture or measure HCP respondent’s actual prescribing rates of MAT or naloxone. Understanding HCP perceptions of naloxone distribution and MAT initiation in the ED may have been further informed by comparing HCP responses to their actual clinical practice as related to their prescribing of these medications. In future research, we will link HCPs with the actual numbers of naloxone and MAT medications prescribed. Additionally, we do not know how many of these barriers or proposed facilitators will impact clinical practice.
Conclusions
A key aim for VHA leadership is to increase veteran access to naloxone distribution and MAT for OUD across clinical areas. The present study aimed to identify HCP perceptions of barriers and facilitators to the naloxone distribution and MAT-initiation programs in VHA ED/UCCs to inform the development of a targeted QI program to implement these opioid safety measures. Although the survey yielded a low response rate, results allowed us to identify important action items for our QI program, such as the development of clear protocols, follow-up plans, and systems for referral of care and HCP educational materials related to MAT and naloxone. We hope this work will serve as the basis for ED/UCC-tailored programs that can provide customized educational programs for HCPs designed to overcome known barriers to naloxone and MAT initiation.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the VA Office of Specialty Care Services 10P11 and through funding provided by the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA).
