Who Receives Care in VA Medical Foster Homes?
Objective: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical Foster Home (MFH) program was created to give veterans a community-based alternative to institutional long-term care (LTC). This study describes demographic, clinical, and functional characteristics of veterans in MFHs.
Methods: Findings from in-home assessments of veterans in MFHs tied to 4 VHA medical centers for ≥ 90 days between April 2014 and December 2015 were collected. Trained nurses completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments for 92 veterans in MFHs. The assessment included demographic characteristics, cognition, behaviors, depression, pain, functional status, mobility, and morbidity.
Results: MFH veterans were primarily male (85%), aged > 65 years (83%), cognitively impaired (55%), and had a diagnosis of depression (52%). Overall, 22% had caregiver-reported aggressive behaviors and 45% self-reported pain. More than half used a wheelchair (56%). Of the 11 activities of daily living (ADLs) assessed, MFH residents were most likely to require assistance with bathing and least likely to require assistance with bed mobility and eating, although more than half required eating assistance.
Conclusions: Veterans residing in MFHs have a wide range of care needs, including some veterans with high needs for help with ADLs and others who are completely independent in performing ADLs. These results provide insights about which veterans are staying in MFH care. Future studies should explore how VHA care providers refer veterans to LTC settings.
Limitations
There are several potential limitations in this study. First, there are limits to the generalizability of the MFH sample given that the sample of veterans was not randomly selected and that weights were not applied to account for nonresponse bias. Second, charting requirements in MFHs are less intensive compared with nursing home tracking. While the training for research nurses on how to conduct MDS assessments in MFHs was designed to simulate the process in nursing homes, MDS data were likely impacted by differences in charting practices. In addition, MFH caregivers may report certain items, such as aggressive behaviors, more often because they observe MFH veterans round-the-clock compared with NH caregivers who work in shifts and have a lower caregiver to resident ratio. The current data suggest differences in prevalence of behavioral symptoms.
Future studies should examine whether this reflects differences in the populations served or differences in how MFH caregivers track and manage behavioral symptoms. Third, this study was conducted at only MFH sites associated with 4 VAMCs, thus our findings may not be generalizable to veterans in other areas. Finally, there may be differences in the veterans who agreed to participate in the study compared with those who declined to participate. For example, it is possible that the eligible MFH veterans who declined to participate in this study were more functionally impaired than those who did participate. More than one-third (39%) of the family members of cognitively impaired MFH veterans who did not participate cited concerns about the veteran’s frailty as a primary reason for declining to participate. Consequently, the high level of functional status among veterans included in this study compared to nursing home residents may be in part a result of selection bias from more ADL-impaired veterans declining to participate in the study.
Conclusions
Although the MFH program has provided LTC nationally to veterans for nearly 2 decades, this study is the first to administer in-home MDS assessments to veterans in MFHs, allowing for a detailed description of cognitive, functional, and behavioral characteristics of MFH residents. In this study, we found that veterans currently receiving care in MFHs have a wide range of care needs. Our findings indicate that MFHs are caring for some veterans with high functional impairment as well as those who are completely independent in performing ADLs.
Moreover, these results are a preliminary attempt to assist VA health care providers in determining which veterans can be cared for in an MFH such that they can make informed referrals to this alternative LTC setting. To improve the generalizability of these findings, future studies should collect MDS 3.0 assessments longitudinally from a representative sample of veterans in MFHs. Further research is needed to explore how VA providers make the decision to refer a veteran to an MFH compared to a nursing home. Additionally, the percentage of veterans in this study who reported experiencing pain may indicate the need to identify innovative, integrated pain management programs for home settings.
