ADVERTISEMENT

γ-δ T-Cell Lymphoma With Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

This unique presentation may help in further characterizing and understanding this uncommon disease and in developing more effective therapies.
Federal Practitioner. 2016 May;33(4)s:
Author and Disclosure Information

Lacking specific symptoms, HSGDTCL is usually diagnosed late. The diagnosis should be suspected in young men who present with the aforementioned symptoms. However, not everyone with HSGDTCL falls in that group—the present patient was a 77-year-old woman.

Hepatosplenic GDTCL staging is similar to staging of other non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Total-body CT with contrast, bone marrow aspiration/biopsy, and direct lesion biopsy are required. Although positron emission tomography is generally thought to be as useful in TCL as in B-cell lymphomas, there is not enough evidence to support its use specifically in HSGDTCL.16 The staging classification follows the Ann Arbor system, with the majority of cases classified as stage IV.

Hepatosplenic GDTCL are aggressive tumors with a strong tendency to rapidly progress, and they are highly resistant to primary chemotherapy agents. Remission is rarely complete with use of conventional chemotherapy agents. Most patients die of the disease within 2 years of
diagnosis.12 Although the rarity of HSGDTCL has made it difficult to identify any clear prognostic factors, a correlation between thrombocytopenia severity and disease progression has been found in many studies.17 There is no standard treatment regimen. Proposed therapies
include splenectomy (for diagnosis or thrombocytopenia management), corticosteroids, alkylating agents, purine analogue, anthracycline-containing regimens, and cytarabine/cisplatin combinations. The anthracycline-based regimen most commonly used as first-line therapy is CHOP, or CHOP derivatives, with complete remission rates between 30% and 45%. However, long-term results remain disappointing (median relapse time 4 months).10 In 3 reviews, median survival was 16 months, 11 months, and 9.5 months.10,17,18 In the International T-Cell Lymphoma Project study, the 5-year failure-free survival rate was 0%, and the overall survival rate was 7%.4 In these studies, the majority of patients received some variation of CHOP-based therapy, and although positive responses were appreciated in many of the cases, they were generally short-lived.

These results have been disappointing, and other modalities have been tried—including high-dose cytarabine regimens, 2'-deoxycoformycin (pentostatin), and anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab).19 In an HSGDTCL study, 2 of 21 patients treated with platinum/cytarabine-based induction regimens were still in remission at 42 and 52 months.17 Another study examined a variety of induction regimens used to treat HSGDTCL in 15 patients.18 Responses tended to be more durable in patients who received a dose-intense Hyper-CVIDDoxil regimen (fractionated cyclophosphamide, liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone) alternated with methotrexate and cytarabine. Complete response was 50%, and median duration of complete response was 8 months. Over the past 10 years, a few case reports have described successful treatment with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation.20

Conclusion

The present case represents a unique HSGDTCL presentation. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report of HSGDTCL presenting with acute disseminated intravascular coagulation and AIHA with both cold and warm antibodies.

Hepatosplenic GDTCL is a rare, novel disease. To understand more about this pathology, investigators need to better characterize the disease process and the manifestations. The hope is that more information will contribute to the development of more effective therapies. The unique presentation reported here may help in further characterizing and understanding this uncommon disease.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies.

Click here to read the digital edition.