Economic Burden and Quality of Life of Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Helsinki, Finland: A Survey-Based Study
We investigated medical costs and quality of life (QOL) in 167 patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) at a tertiary health care hospital in Helsinki, Finland. In the studied cohort, AD caused a substantial economic burden to the patients and health care system. Most patients with AD in Finland can achieve disease control with topical treatments, but it is important to efficiently manage the patients who require additional supportive measures and specialist consultations, which may be challenging in the primary health care system due to the relapsing and remitting nature of the disease.
Practice Points
- Atopic dermatitis (AD) causes a substantial economic burden.
- Atopic dermatitis profoundly affects quality of life and is associated with psychiatric comorbidities. With effective treatments, AD-associated comorbidities may be decreased and the economic burden for the patient and health care system reduced.
In the Finnish public health care system, 40% of the cost for prescription medication and emollients is reimbursed after an initial deductible of €50. Emollients are reimbursed up to an amount of 1500 g/mo. Therefore, patients mostly acquired emollients as prescription medicine and not over-the-counter. Nonprescription medicaments were not included in our study, so the actual costs of topical treatment may have been higher.28
In our cohort, 61.7% of the patients reported food allergies, and 70.1% reported allergic conjunctivitis. However, the study included only questionnaire-based data, and many of these patients probably had symptoms not associated with IgE-mediated allergies. The high prevalence indicates a substantial concomitant burden of more than skin symptoms in patients with AD.29 Nine percent of patients reported a diagnosed psychiatric disorder, and 29.3% had self-reported anxiety or depression often or very often in the last year. Based on these findings, there may be high percentages of undiagnosed psychiatric comorbidities such as depression and anxiety disorders in patients with moderate to severe AD in Finland.30 An important limitation of our study was that the patient data were based on a voluntary and anonymous survey and that depression and anxiety were addressed solely by a single question. In addition, the response rate cannot be analyzed correctly, and the demographics of the survey responders likely will differ substantially from all patients with AD at the university hospital.
Atopic dermatitis had a substantial effect on QOL in our patient cohort. Inadequate treatment of AD is known to negatively affect patient QOL and may lead to hospitalization or frequent oral corticosteroid courses.31,32 In most cases, structured patient education and early follow-up visits may improve patient adherence to treatment and should be considered as an integral part of AD treatment.33 In the investigated Finnish tertiary care hospital, a structured patient education system unfortunately was still lacking, though it has been proven effective elsewhere.34 In addition, patient-centred educational programs are recommended in European guidelines for the treatment of AD.35
Medical costs of AD may increase in the future as new treatments with higher direct costs, such as dupilumab, are introduced. Eichenfeld et al36 analyzed electronic health plan claims in patients with AD with newly introduced systemic therapies and phototherapies after the availability of dupilumab in the United States (March 2017). Mean annualized total cost in all patients was $20,722; the highest in the dupilumab group with $36,505. Compared to our data, the total costs are much higher, but these are likely to rise in Finland in the future if a substantial amount (eg, 1%–5%) of patients will be on advanced therapies, including dupilumab. If advanced therapies will be introduced more broadly in Finland (eg, in the treatment of moderate AD [10%–20% of patients]), they will represent a major direct cost to the health care system. Zimmermann et al37 showed in a cost-utility analysis that dupilumab improves health outcomes but with additional direct costs, and it is likely more cost-effective in patients with severe AD. Conversely, more efficient treatments may improve severe AD, reduce the need for hospitalization and recurrent doctors’ appointments as well as absence from work, and improve patient QOL,38 consequently decreasing indirect medical costs and disease burden. Ariëns et al39 showed in a recent registry-based study that dupilumab treatment induces a notable rise in work productivity and reduction of associated costs in patients with difficult-to-treat AD.
Conclusion
We aimed to analyze the economic burden of AD in Finland before the introduction of dupilumab. It will be interesting to see what the introduction of dupilumab and other novel systemic therapies have on total economic burden and medical costs. Most patients with AD in Finland can achieve disease control with topical treatments, but it is important to efficiently manage the patients who require additional supportive measures and specialist consultations, which may be challenging in the primary health care system because of the relapsing and remitting nature of the disease.