What is the appropriate diagnostic evaluation of fibroids?
Recommendations from others
A 1994 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) bulletin stated that uterine fibroids can be diagnosed with 95% certainty by examination alone.10 ACOG recommends augmenting physical examination with ultrasonography in cases involving obese women or when adnexal pathology cannot be excluded based on examination alone. This bulletin also points out that routine ultrasonography does not improve long-term clinical outcomes for fibroids. A more recent bulletin (2000) addressed management but not evaluation or diagnosis of leiomyomas.11
A 2003 guideline from the Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Canada recommends against routine ultrasonography, since it rarely affects the clinical management of uterine fibroids. However, it emphasizes the importance of ruling out underlying endometrial pathology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.12
When evaluating potential fibroids, a reasonable first step is a sonogram
Lynda DeArmond, MD
Waco Family Practice Residency Program, Waco, Tex
In the asymptomatic patient with an enlarged, irregularly contoured uterus on routine exam, the differential includes fibroids, fibroids, and fibroids. My usual next step is to get a sonogram. The test is noninvasive, well-tolerated by patients, and significantly less expensive than the alternatives. It quickly and easily gives a great deal of useful information regarding the size, shape, consistency of the myometrium and the endometrium, from which we can reassure the patient regarding the benign natural history of this finding, especially in the perimenopausal woman. If the patient presents with symptoms of abnormal bleeding, pelvic pressure, or adnexal findings on exam, the review suggests that further workup may be indicated. However, the sonogram remains a very useful initial test even in this case.
