ADVERTISEMENT

As Federal Cuts Deepen Mental Health Crisis, Philanthropy Scrambles to Fill the Gap

New barriers to mental health care arose after wide grant cancellations at the NIH and NSF. To keep research and funding from grinding to a halt, some foundations and nonprofits are joining forces.

It's hardly news that the United States is experiencing a mental health crisis -- the CDC says as much. But experts in the field say that the current administration has severely compounded the problem by eliminating agency funding and national programs, slashing research grants and data resources, and creating new barriers to behavioral health care.

Philanthropic foundations aim to do what they can to address the shortfall. The numbers, however, just don't add up.

"Some big foundations and philanthropies have said they're going to increase what they give out in the next 4 years, but they'll never be able to fill the gap," said Morgan F. McDonald, MD, national director of population health at the Milbank Memorial Fund in New York City, which works with states on health policy. "Even if every one of them were to spend down their endowments, they still couldn't."

Given the financial limitations, some foundations are taking a different tack. While looking for ways to join forces with fellow nonprofits, they are providing emergency grants to bridge funding in the short term to keep research from grinding to a halt.

Budget Cuts Reach Far and Wide

Mental health research certainly didn't escape the extensive grant cancellations at the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.

"It's already affecting our ability to stay on the cutting edge of research, best practices, and treatment approaches," said Zainab Okolo, EdD, senior vice president of policy, advocacy, and government relations at The Jed Foundation in New York City, which focuses on the emotional health of teens and young adults.

The upheaval is evident in an array of government agencies. The Health Resources and Services Administration, which last year awarded $12 billion in grants to community health centers and addiction treatment services, has seen > one-fourth of its staff eliminated. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration has lost more than a third of its staff as federal cuts took a $1 billion bite out of its operating budget. The Education Department has halted $1 billion in grants used to hire mental health workers in school districts nationwide.

"We're very, very concerned about cuts to behavioral health systems," said Alonzo Plough, PhD, chief science officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in Princeton, New Jersey. "Doctors and nurses working in safety-net clinics are seeing tremendous reductions."

All in all, the new tax and spending law means $1 trillion in cuts to health care programs including Medicaid -- the nation's largest payer for mental health services -- Medicare, and Affordable Care Act insurance. An estimated 10 million Americans are expected to lose their health coverage as a result.

"When accessibility to care goes down, there's a chance that more people will die by suicide," said Jill Harkavy-Friedman, PhD, senior vice president of research at the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. "But it also means people will come into care later in the course of their difficulties. Health professionals will be dealing with worse problems."

Foundations Take Emergency Measures

Even if private dollars can't replace what's been lost, philanthropic and medical foundations are stepping up.

We're seeing a lot of foundations and funders that are shifting their funding," said Alyson Niemann, CEO of Mindful Philanthropy, an organization that works with > 1000 private funders to marshal resources for mental health. This year, in response to federal cuts, "many increased funding to health and well-being, doubling or even tripling it," Niemann noted.

"They're making a great deal of effort to respond with emergency funds, really getting in the trenches and being good partners to their grantees," she said. "We've seen them asking deliberate questions, thinking about where their funding can have the most impact."

The American Psychological Foundation (APF), a longtime supporter of research and innovation, is addressing the current crisis with 2 initiatives, Michelle Quist Ryder, PhD, the organization's CEO, explained in an email. The first is APF Director Action, which funds innovative interventions at the community level. The second, Direct Action Crisis Funding Grants, will help continue research that is at risk of stalling because of budget cuts.

"Studies that are 'paused' or lose funding often cannot simply pick back up where they left off. Having to halt progress on a project can invalidate the work already completed," Ryder wrote. "These Direct Action Crisis Grants help bridge funding gaps and keep research viable."

At the same time, collaboration between foundations is becoming more widespread as they seek to maximize their impact. Philanthropic organizations are sharing ideas and best practices as well as pooling fundings.

"The goal of philanthropy is to help people," Harkavy-Friedman said. "There's strength in numbers and more dollars in numbers."

Some See Hope in Raised Voices

Despite the emergency scrambling, many of those in the trenches remain surprisingly optimistic. Some point out that the current turmoil has put a helpful spotlight on behavioral health care. Practitioners, meanwhile, have an essential role to play.

"There's a reason that things were the way they were: People advocated for many years to get where we've gotten," Harkavy-Friedman said, citing veterans' mental health care, the national violent death reporting system, and 988 as examples. "We have to raise our voices louder -- professionals in particular, because they know the impact a person in the general public many not fully grasp."

As a growing numbers of health professionals call attention to the damage wrought by deep cuts in the federal budget, foundation executives see an opportunity.

"In the mental health field, there's a deficit in the narrative, where there's a lot of focus on crisis. What we're hoping to do is shift the narrative toward 'How do we flourish together?'" Niemann said. "Sometimes deficits are where the most incredible innovations appear."

Debbie Koenig is a health writer whose work has been published by WebMD, The New York Times, and The Washington Post.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.