More on neurotransmitters
The authors respond
Thank you for your thoughtful commentary. Our conceptual article was not designed to cover enough ground to be completely thorough. Everything you wrote adds to what we wanted to bring to the reader’s attention. The mechanisms of disease in psychiatry are numerous and still elusive, and the brain’s complexity is staggering. Our main goal was to point out possible correlations between specific symptoms and specific neurotransmitter activity. We had to oversimplify to make the article concise enough for publication. Neurotransmitter effects are based on their synthesis, storage, release, reuptake, and degradation. A receptor’s quantity and quality of function, inhibitors, inducers, and many other factors are involved in neurotransmitter performance. And, of course, there are additional fundamental neurotransmitters beyond the 6 we touched on. Our ability to sort through all of this is still rudimentary. You also reflect on the emerging methods to objectively measure neurotransmitter activity, which will eventually find their way to clinical practice and become invaluable. Still, we treat people, not tests or pictures, so diagnostic thinking based on clinical presentation will forever remain a cornerstone of dealing with individual patients.
We hope scientists and clinicians such as yourself will improve our concept and make it truly practical.
Dmitry M. Arbuck, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Medicine
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana
President and Medical Director
Indiana Polyclinic
Carmel, Indiana
José Miguel Salmerón, MD
Professor
Department of Psychiatry
Universidad del Valle School of Medicine/Hospital
Universitario del Valle
Cali, Colombia
Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in their response, or with manufacturers of competing products.