Evidence-Based Reviews

Performing capacity evaluations: What’s expected from your consult

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Physician bias has been identified in capacity evaluations. See Box 2.4,10-12

Tools used in capacity evaluations

Most capacity evaluations are conducted by clinical interview (Box 3). The reliability of physicians’ unstructured judgments of capacity has been poor.13 In a study of 5 physicians who made a determination of capacity after watching a videotape of capacity assessments, the rate of agreement among the subjects was no better than that of chance.14

There is no specific, simple, quick test to assess capacity.

Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination. The MMSE has not been found to be predictive of decision-making capacity. It has been found to correlate with clinical judgments of incapacity, and may be used to identify patients at the high and low ends of the range of capacity, especially among older persons who exhibit cognitive impairment.15 Patients who have severe dementia (MMSE score <16) have a high likelihood of being unable to consent to treatment.16

MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment. The MacCAT-T is a structured interviewing tool used to evaluate a patient’s decision-making ability. It is the most commonly used screening tool to evaluate decision-making capacity. Advantages of the MacCAT-T include a higher inter-rater agreement and—unlike other assessment instruments—its ability to incorporate information specific to a patient’s decision-making situation.17 The MacCAT-T requires training and experience to administer.

Bottom Line

Physicians make decisions about a patient’s decision-making capacity. Courts determine competence by a formal judicial proceeding. The psychiatric consultant’s role in capacity evaluations is to determine if the patient 1) possesses the requisite knowledge about the specific referral issue and 2) demonstrates a voluntary and reliable decision.

Related Resources

  • The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. www.macarthur.virginia.edu/treatment.html.
  • Resnick P, Sorrentino R: Forensic considerations (chapter. 8). In: Psychosomatic medicine. Blumenfield M, Strain JJ, eds. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:91-106.
  • Appelbaum PS. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1834-1840.

Disclosure
Dr. Sorrentino reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Next Article:

Medicaid enrollment up 15% in October due to ACA

Related Articles