ADVERTISEMENT

Life after near death: What interventions work for a suicide survivor?

Current Psychiatry. 2009 August;08(08):35-42
Author and Disclosure Information

Motives and methods of self-harm may suggest an individual's risk for future attempts

An important confounding factor in these findings is that effective lithium treatment requires long-term adherence, which implies a long-term doctor-patient relationship. As Cipriani et al32 noted, patients who can maintain an ongoing therapeutic relationship may be “less disturbed” than those who cannot, making them less likely to kill themselves regardless of pharmacologic treatment. Furthermore, patient interviews reveal that the therapeutic alliance created by a continuous relationship can be a protective support against further SA.33

Clinical implications

Suicide survivors often continue to struggle with suicidality well beyond the index attempt. This suicidality is a maladaptive problem-solving method that functions as a chronic morbid illness. As such, it is not enough to analyze the phenomenon of surviving an SA; one must examine the ongoing process of surviving suicidality.

Consider 3 factors. Consider all 3 factors— motive, method, and management—when addressing suicide survivorship.

Motive does not cleanly predict completion of a given SA, but it can help predict the likelihood of reattempt, which in turn affects the likelihood of eventual completion. Motive also serves as a clinical tool because neutralizing the driving factors behind an individual’s suicide attempt can solve the acute problem and help avert a reattempt.

Method lethality significantly influences survival likelihood. In clinical practice, we have observed that the index attempt is a learning experience for some patients that will inform their choice of method on the next attempt. When interacting with a suicide survivor, carefully assess the reasoning behind their initial choice of method and whether it has evolved toward higher lethality since the index attempt.

Management recommendations after SA continue to evolve. Risk factor management—such as treating underlying mood disorders, home visits to reduce social isolation, and prioritized “green card” contact with psychiatrists—has been shown to decrease reattempt rates, but many other interventions have not shown the expected benefit. Increased intervention rates have not yielded proportional decreases in suicidal ideation, attempts, or completion.

Common themes among effective management techniques appear to be keeping lines of communication open and individualizing treatment. ( Box 2 ). Our group is studying SA patients in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over the past 40 years, seeking connections between motive, method, management, and outcome. We hope trends emerging from this data will inform clinical strategies tailored to subgroups of this patient population.

Box 2

6 key points for managing suicide attempt survivors

Suicide survivors often continue to struggle with suicidality well beyond the index attempt

Consider the SA motive and method when planning how to manage the survivor

Method lethality significantly influences survival likelihood (firearms are the most common and deadly method in the United States)

In many clinical trials, the incidence of suicidal thoughts, plans, gestures, or attempts has not significantly decreased when SA survivors received extra treatment

Management recommendations after SA continue to evolve; effective techniques appear to be keeping lines of communication open and providing individualized treatment

Individualize pharmacologic treatments and psychotherapy to help guide the patient away from maximum suicide risk

SA: suicide attempt

Related resources Drug brand names
  • Carbamazepine • Carbatrol
  • Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid
  • Valproic acid • Depakene, Depakote
Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.