Conference Coverage

Pursuing violators seen as way to achieving mental health parity


 

REPORTING FROM APA

NEW YORK – The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, passed in 2008 and strengthened within the Affordable Care Act, continues to be routinely violated, but there are avenues for complaint that can help keep pressure on third-party payers, according to an update on this topic presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

“There are basically two approaches: One is the top-down approach, which is actual government enforcement; the other is the bottom-up approach, which is to work through the courts with class action suits,” reported Daniel Knoepflmacher, MD, assistant professor of clinical psychiatry at Cornell University, New York.

Dr. Daniel Knoepflmacher

Under the law, third-party payers must provide mental health services at parity to other types of medical or surgical services. Some loopholes used to deny mental health coverage were closed in the Affordable Care Act, but Dr. Knoepflmacher contended that denial of mental health services continues to be a common problem.

Some of the enforcement falls to the Employment Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), which is an agency within the Department of Labor. EBSA, which recently published a report on mental health parity violations spanning 2016-2017, steps in because health insurance is commonly an employee benefit, Dr. Knoepflmacher explained.

In the EBSA report, 136 mental health parity violations were documented, said Dr. Knoepflmacher, who summarized the findings. These were not single denials of coverage but 136 cases of insurance company policy violations that covered thousands or even hundreds of thousands of participants.

For example, one denial of coverage occurred for chronic behavioral disorders. This is a violation of parity, because there are no such restrictions on coverage of chronic physical disorders. In another example, coverage of mental health disorders was provided only when a treatment plan had been submitted.

“Requiring a treatment plan is one of the ways often used to create more onerous requirements for mental health or substance use providers,” Dr. Knoepflmacher said. “What makes this a parity violation is that there is no equivalent restriction for providing medical or surgical benefits.”

Next Article: