Coding change may make cryopreservation more accessible



Physicians hope a coding change for cryopreservation will drive more insurers to cover the procedure.

Starting in 2015, cryopreservation of mature oocytes can be reported using a Category I CPT code, rather than a Category III code, which is associated with experimental procedures.

The shift will hopefully lead to the procedure becoming more accessible to patients by influencing insurers to pay for the treatment, said Dr. George Hill, a Nashville reproductive endocrinologist and former chair of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine’s (ASRM) coding committee.

The new CPT code is 89337 for cryopreservation of mature oocytes. It was previously reported with code 0059T, which has been deleted. Details about the coding change were announced by ASRM in late January.

“This is a real advantage to physicians that this has been recognized as a mainstream procedure,” said Dr. Hill, who is ASRM’s current treasurer. “When you’ve got a Category I code, it takes away a little of the stigma of being experimental.”

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) said in a January 2014 opinion that cryopreservation of oocytes should no longer be considered experimental for women facing infertility as a result of chemotherapy or other gonadotoxic therapies.

The ACOG guidelines endorsed a joint 2013 document from ASRM and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology that also advocated removing the experimental label. The decisions were fueled by improvements in mature oocyte cryopreservation and the increasing survival rates of cryopreserved mature egg cells, according to the opinions, but both policy statements stopped short of recommending oocyte crypreservation solely for delaying childbearing in healthy women.

The popularity of cryopreservation has exploded in recent years, with more women seeking the service for various reasons, said Dr. Mitchell Rosen, director of the University of California, San Francisco’s fertility preservation center, which specializes in helping cancer patients preserve their fertility prior to treatment.

“It is now almost common practice to see patients coming in electively wanting to freeze their eggs,” he said in an interview. “More and more women are delaying child bearing. They want to have opportunities to expand their reproductive potential so they’re not forced into situations or possibly not able to have children in the future.”


Recommended Reading

Medicare at 50: Hassles lead to doctor opt-outs, new business models
MDedge ObGyn
President’s budget would extend Medicaid pay bump, repeal SGR
MDedge ObGyn
Medicaid’s share of state budgets was nearly 26% in 2014
MDedge ObGyn
The private-academic surgeon salary gap: Would you pick academia if you stood to lose $1.3 million?
MDedge ObGyn
Study: Surgical readmissions tied to new discharge complications, not prior conditions
MDedge ObGyn
Republican-controlled House votes to repeal ACA
MDedge ObGyn
GOP lawmakers offer ACA alternative that includes tort reform
MDedge ObGyn
Expanding laborist, midwifery services lowers cesarean delivery rates
MDedge ObGyn
ICD-10: No more extensions expected – Senate panel
MDedge ObGyn
Lawmakers, experts favor October start for ICD-10
MDedge ObGyn