Medicolegal Issues

Data on liability claims offer bright spots for ObGyns— and sobering statistics

Author and Disclosure Information

Twenty-five years of claims data from the Physician Insurers Association of America suggest that things are improving in obstetrics and gynecology—but the amount of dollars swallowed by indemnity payments remains extremely high



Good news on the medical liability front, Doctor!

Yes, that’s right, good news.

According to data from the Physician Insurers Association of America (PIAA), the number of claims that were paid in the ObGyn category between 2006 and 2011 was 44% lower than the number of claims paid between 1986 and 1991.

The percentage of claims that were paid also decreased over the same quarter century. During 1986–1990, 37.25% of all claims were paid in the ObGyn category, compared with 31.73% during 2006–2010.1

And when claims for both periods are calculated in 2010 dollars, the amount paid also declined—by more than $138 million!

These are three of the findings that reflect “significant improvement” in obstetrics and gynecology in medical liability, says John B. Stanchfield, MD, an endocrinologist who, for 25 years, was medical director of the Utah Medical Insurance Association (UMIA)—a member company of PIAA. PIAA is the insurance industry trade association.

PIAA member companies in the United States “include large national insurance companies, mid-size regional writers, single-state insurers, and specialty companies that serve specific health care–provider niche markets. Collectively, these companies provide insurance protection to more than 60% of America’s private practice physicians and write approximately 46%, or $5.2 billion, of the total industry premium.”2

The improvement in ObGyn comes as no surprise to Dr. Stanchfield because the specialty was “the first group that got ‘risk-managed’ almost universally across the country,” he says. “In our little company out here in Utah, in 1985, we were told that if we didn’t do something [about lawsuits in obstetrics and gynecology], we weren’t going to be able to insure that class anymore because we wouldn’t be able to collect enough money. That’s what the actuaries told us, but it wasn’t unique to us—it was a nationwide problem.”

Why was the ObGyn specialty, in particular, in need of aggressive risk management? What made ObGyn claims unique?

“It’s infant injury,” says Dr. Stanchfield. “It’s injury to the baby. Those claims, you start talking at a million dollars.”

Another reason may be that some claims in this specialty category involve doctors other than ObGyns who provide obstetric care—for example, family practice physicians.

A risk manager’s perspective

After receiving the warning about ObGyn claims, UMIA got busy. First, it formed a committee comprising perinatologists, ObGyns, family practice physicians, claims specialists, and attorneys. “We analyzed all claims that were paid, looking for common denominators,” says Dr. Stanchfield. Improvement was clearly needed in about 10 areas, so “we basically created a risk-management program and then mandated it.” In the process, the organization published a booklet entitled Insurance Recommendations for Obstetrical Practice, of which Dr. Stanchfield was the editor.3

The booklet offers guidance on 10 potential “problem” areas:

  • antepartum testing
  • hypertension and pregnancy
  • operative vaginal delivery
  • breech delivery
  • oxytocin administration
  • vaginal birth after cesarean
  • use of misoprostol
  • shoulder dystocia
  • preterm labor
  • hospital standards.

Fewer claims and more physicians

The declining number and percentage of paid claims in obstetrics and gynecology over 25 years may be even more impressive than the figures suggest, says Dr. Stanchfield.

“Gestalt tells me that through the years there are more practicing physicians rather than fewer,” so the denominator is increasing even as these claims are declining—making the decrease “even more powerful.”

The numbers haven’t improved to the same degree in other specialties, Dr. Stanchfield says. “If you look at global data, the decrease in paid claims might have been 10% to 15%. In ObGyn, if you compare the last 5-year block of data with the first 5-year block, the number of paid claims is almost cut in half.”

What brought about this improvement?

“There weren’t any groundbreaking medical or surgical technological advances during this period. It was just doing it better. And the main push to doing it better in this country, in my opinion, is risk management.”

Slicing the data

Now for the not-so-great news: In 2010 alone, more than $55 million was paid out in the ObGyn category for 10 patient conditions. Topping the list were “pregnancy” and “brain-damaged infant.” The $55 million figure represents the money paid for the top 10 most commonly cited conditions in cases closed during 2010 (TABLE 1).


Claims categorized under the rather broad category of pregnancy usually were placed there because a more appropriate category was lacking, says Dr. Stanchfield. These claims typically involve “things that happen—usually to the baby—that result in a lawsuit other than brain damage per se.” For example, a claim that involved skull fracture without brain damage might fall into this zone, he says.

Problematic procedures

Next Article: