Robotic Hysterectomy Safe in Morbidly Obese


From the AAGL Annual Meeting

HOLLYWOOD, FLA. – Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted hysterectomy did not differ significantly for women whether they were nonobese, obese, or morbidly obese, in a study of 442 women classified according to body mass index.

“Our findings reiterate the safety of robotic hysterectomy for the obese and morbidly obese patients,” Dr. Taryn Gallo said. “As minimally invasive surgeons, we know every day we are facing bigger and bigger patients. You can't underestimate the value of being able to offer these women a minimally invasive approach and sending them home the next day.”

Approximately 34% of U.S. women are obese with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m

Difficulty obtaining pneumoperitoneum secondary to preperitoneal fat, difficulty ventilating these women in steep Trendelenburg position, and difficulty gaining adequate exposure during surgery are among the challenges in this patient population, she added.

“In the gynecologic literature, few studies have addressed robotic surgery for the morbidly obese patient,” Dr. Gallo said. So she and her colleagues retrospectively studied women who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy over a 4-year period in a single surgeon teaching practice. Dr. Masoud Azodi, the senior author and surgeon in this study, is director of the minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) fellowship program at Yale University, New Haven.

A total of 58% of the 442 women were obese or morbidly obese, said Dr. Gallo, a gynecologist in private practice in Sebastian, Fla. She was a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery fellow at Bridgeport Hospital/Yale New Haven Health System in Connecticut at the time of the study.

“All BMI groups had similar outcomes,” Dr. Gallo said. Median operative times, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and complication rates did not differ significantly among the nonobese women (BMI less than 30 kg/m

Median operative time for the entire cohort from skin incision to skin closure was 135 minutes. This included time for any concomitant procedures, such as lymphadenectomy or pelvic floor repair, she said. Median operative time by BMI group was similar: 141 minutes for the nonobese group, 135 minutes for the obese women, and 124 minutes for the morbidly obese.

Three patients, one in each BMI group, were converted to laparotomy, for an overall rate of 0.7%.

Median estimated blood loss overall and in each BMI group was 100 mL. Median length of hospital stay of 1 day, likewise, was the same overall and in each group.

The overall complication rate in the study was 12%. This figure includes a major complication rate of 4% (readmissions, reoperations) and a minor complication rate of 8%. “By BMI group, the complications – major, minor, or total – these did not differ,” Dr. Gallo said.

Urinary complications affected 11 women (2.6%), including 1% who had bladder injuries recognized and repaired intraoperatively and 1.6% who had ureteral injuries. Two women with ureteral injuries were repaired with stenting, and four others required subsequent ureteral reimplantation, she said.

Bowel injuries occurred in six patients. Four cases were recognized and repaired intraoperatively, and two women required reoperation and bowel resection.

The remainder of the complications in the study occurred less than 1% of the time. One patient, in the nonobese BMI group, had a vaginal cuff dehiscence, for an overall rate of 0.2% in the study.

Patient demographics were similar between groups. For example, the median age was 51 years in the nonobese, 55 years in the obese, and 54 years in the morbidly obese groups. Women underwent hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications, including early endometrial cancer, early cervical cancer, and occult ovarian cancer.

The retrospective design of the study is a limitation, Dr. Gallo said, and no absolute conclusions can be drawn. “Also, our study was not adequately powered. We would have required more than 4,300 patients to detect a difference in operative time between BMI groups with a power of 80%.”

She added, “Our study may not be generalizable to other surgeons or other institutions – this was a single surgeon with a high surgical volume and extensive experience in laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

“Despite these limitations, we believe our study offers clinically relevant information pertaining to the growing number of obese patients that will be faced by minimally invasive surgeons,” she said.

Assessment of costs associated with robotic-assisted hysterectomy was outside the scope of this study.

Next Article: