Conference Coverage

Earlier anticoagulation safe in stroke with AFib: ELAN



Patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke and found to have atrial fibrillation (AFib) can be safely started on a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) much earlier than starting generally occurs in current clinical practice, a new study suggests.

The ELAN trial found that starting DOAC treatment earlier was not associated with an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) but rather was linked to a lower rate of ischemic events.

“We conclude that there is no reason to delay DOAC treatment in these patients. Our results suggest that early DOAC treatment is reasonable; it is unlikely to cause harm, and it is probably better at reducing ischemic events,” lead investigator of the study, Urs Fischer, MD, professor of neurology at University Hospital Basel (Switzerland), commented in an interview.

“This trial will change clinical practice in that we can feel much more reassured that starting DOAC treatment early in these patients will not cause harm,” he said.

Senior investigator Jesse Dawson, MD, professor of stroke medicine at Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, added: “This issue of timing of DOAC treatment causes a lot of anxiety in our daily workload. Clinicians are scared of causing an ICH, so they tend to wait. These results will ease a lot of that anxiety.”

Jesse Dawson, MD, a professor at the University of Glasgow.

Dr. Jesse Dawson

Dr. Fischer presented the results of the ELAN trial at the European Stroke Organisation Conference (ESOC) in Munich. The trial was also simultaneously published online in The New England Journal of Medicine.

He explained that patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke who are found to have atrial fibrillation need to be started on anticoagulation to reduce the risk for a recurrent stroke. But there are no clear guidelines on when to start anticoagulation in these patients at present, with concerns that starting very early may increase the risk for hemorrhagic transformation and ICH.

Based on observations that patients with larger strokes have a higher risk for ICH in the early post-stroke period, some guidelines advise different times for starting anticoagulation for different stroke severities: 1 day for a transient ischemic attack, 3 days for a minor stroke, 6 days for a moderate stroke, and 12 days for a severe stroke – known as the 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-day rule.

“But this is not based on evidence – just on expert opinion,” Dr. Fischer noted. “The ELAN trial was conducted to obtain more solid information on optimal timing for starting anticoagulation and whether we can safely start a DOAC earlier than these guidelines currently advise.”

For the trial, which was conducted in 15 countries, 2,013 patients with an acute ischemic stroke and found to have AFib were randomly selected to start DOAC treatment earlier or later.

The later-treatment strategy followed the current approach of starting treatment at day 3 or 4 after a minor stroke, day 6 or 7 after a moderate stroke, or day 12, 13, or 14 after a major stroke, whereas the earlier-treatment group started DOAC treatment within 48 hours after a minor or moderate stroke or on day 6 or 7 after a major stroke.

In terms of stroke severity, which was defined on imaging-based criteria, 37% of patients had a minor stroke, 40% had a moderate stroke, and 23% had a major stroke.

The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or vascular death within 30 days after randomization.

Results showed that this occurred in 2.9% in the early-treatment group and 4.1% in the later-treatment group (risk difference, –1.18 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, –2.84-0.47) by 30 days.

Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 1.4% in the early-treatment group and 2.5% in the later-treatment group (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.29-1.07). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in two participants (0.2%) in both groups by 30 days.

The rates of the outcomes increased only slightly more at 90 days than at 30 days, “findings that suggest there was not an excessive risk associated with early anticoagulation through that period,” the researchers report in the NEJM paper.

“Early treatment initiation can therefore be supported if indicated or if desired,” they conclude.

“The most important finding was that among 2,000 patients randomized, there was a very low rate of bleeding complications and no increase in any bleeding complication in the early DOAC group. This has been a major worry about starting anticoagulation early,” Dr. Fischer commented.

“These are very practical findings in that we can keep things simple,” Dr. Dawson added. “If the patient has a big stroke, anticoagulation with a DOAC can now be started at 6 days. For everyone else, we can start DOAC treatment as soon as possible without fear of causing harm. So, we can now confidently give patients with a minor or moderate stroke, as defined by imaging, a beneficial treatment as soon as we establish they are having an ischemic stroke and have AFib.”

Dr. Dawson pointed out that about 25% of patients with ischemic stroke are found to have AFib on admission ECG, and in another 4%-5%, AFib is found in the first 48 hours. “These are the patients we are targeting in this study.”

The researchers note that the trial did not have a statistical superiority or noninferiority design but rather aimed to estimate the treatment effects of early initiation versus later initiation of DOACs.

“This trial was slightly different in that we weren’t testing a strict statistical hypothesis because we didn’t have any data with which to formulate what sort of effect size to aim for, so we performed a qualitative trial to look at what the event rates were with the two approaches,” Dr. Fischer explained. “Our main findings are that ICH rates were not increased with early DOAC treatment and that ischemic event rates were numerically reduced, but because we didn’t have strict statistical limits, we can only say this is a high probability but not a certainty.”

Dr. Dawson added: “We can say from these results that there is a high level of probability that early DOAC treatment does not cause harm and a reasonable probability that it reduces risks of a recurrent stroke or other ischemic event.”

The researchers give an estimate of the effect size for the primary composite endpoint, which combines the major ischemic and bleeding events, ranging from a 2.8% lower risk to a 0.5% higher risk with early DOAC treatment.

“So, it is very likely that the composite endpoint would be lower,” Dr. Dawson said.

Dr. Fischer noted that a previous study (TIMING) tried to address the issue of earlier versus later anticoagulation in these patients but was stopped early after 880 patients had been enrolled because of slow recruitment.

“Results from this study failed to show superiority of early versus late DOAC treatment but they did suggest noninferiority, and they also found no increase in major bleeding complications, which is an added reassurance,” he commented.

Another trial looking at early versus late anticoagulation in these patients, OPTIMAS, is ongoing in the United Kingdom and is aiming to randomize 3,500 patients.


Recommended Reading

Brain stimulation can improve prognosis following a stroke and other neurological diseases
MDedge Neurology
Cancer risk elevated after stroke in younger people
MDedge Neurology
New update on left atrial appendage closure recommendations
MDedge Neurology
Disordered sleep tied to a marked increase in stroke risk
MDedge Neurology
Antiphospholipid antibodies linked to future CV events
MDedge Neurology
FDA breakthrough designation for spinal cord stimulation device
MDedge Neurology
‘Bony’ stroke: Bone defects can cause recurrent stroke
MDedge Neurology
AHA backs screening for cognitive impairment after stroke
MDedge Neurology
Stroke scale cutoff might not be ideal guide for ordering CTA and detecting large vessel occlusions
MDedge Neurology
AHA urges action against racial inequities in stroke care
MDedge Neurology