Approach to dysphagia
Normal workup – hypervigilance
In a subset of patients, all diagnostic testing for structural, inflammatory, or motility disorders is normal. These patients are classified as having a functional esophageal disorder. Despite normal testing, patients still have significant symptoms including epigastric pain, chest pain, globus sensation, or difficulty swallowing. It is theorized that a degree of visceral hypersensitivity between the brain-gut axis contributes to ongoing symptoms.24 Studies for effective treatments are ongoing but typically include cognitive-behavioral therapy, brain-gut behavioral therapy, swallow therapy antidepressants, or short courses of proton pump inhibitors.9
Conclusion
In this review article, we discussed the diagnostic approach for esophageal dysphagia. Initial assessment requires a thorough history, differentiation between oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia, and determination of who warrants an upper endoscopy. Upper endoscopy may reveal structural or inflammatory causes of dysphagia, including strictures, masses, or esophagitis, to name a few. If a structural or inflammatory cause is ruled out, this warrants investigation for esophageal motility disorders. The current gold standard for diagnosing EMD is manometry, and supplemental studies, including EndoFLIP, barium esophagram, and pH studies, may provide complimentary data. If workup for dysphagia is normal, evaluation for esophageal hypervigilance causing increased sensitivity to normal or mild sensations may be warranted. In conclusion, the diagnosis of dysphagia is challenging and requires investigation with a systematic approach to ensure timely diagnosis and treatment
Dr. Ronnie and Dr. Bloomberg are in the department of internal medicine at Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Ill. Dr. Venu is in the division of gastroenterology at Loyola. He is on the speakers bureau at Medtronic.
References
1. Adkins C et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(9):1970-9.e2.
2. Bhattacharyya N. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(5):765-9.
3. McCarty EB and Chao TN. Med Clin North Am. 2021;105(5):939-54.
4. Thiyagalingam S et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(2):488-97.
5. Malagelada JR et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(5):370-8.
6. Rommel, N and Hamdy S. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(1):49-59.
7. Liu LWC et al. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2018;1(1):5-19.
8. Schwemmle C et al. HNO. 2015;63(7):504-10.
9. Moayyedi P et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(7):988-1013.
10. Triggs J and Pandolfino J. F1000Res. 2019 Aug 29. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18900.1.
11. Yadlapati R et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058.
12. Yadlapati R et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14053.
13. Fox M et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16(5):533-42.
14. Sweis R and Fox M. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020;22(10):49.
15. Carlson DA et al. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(7):1742-51.
16. Donnan EN and Pandolfino JE. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2020;49(3):427-35.
17. Carlson DA. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2016;32(4):310-8.
18. Zheng T et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022;34(10):e14386.
19. Carlson DA et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(8):1719-28.e3.
20. Carlson DA et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1726-35.
21. Carlson DA et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(10):e14116.
22. Carlson DA et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90(6):915-923.e1.
23. Fox MR et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(4):e14120.
24. Aziz Q et al. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.012.
