ADVERTISEMENT

When are empiric antibiotics appropriate for urinary tract infection symptoms?

The Journal of Family Practice. 2006 April;55(4):338-342
Author and Disclosure Information

 

A recent retrospective case series6 evaluated a telephone guideline for the empiric treatment of UTI for 4177 women in a California HMO. UTI criteria were ≤10 days of dysuria; frequency, urgency, pressure, or increased nocturia; or gross hematuria. Women were excluded if they had any one of a variety of contraindications (TABLE 1). Upper tract infection occurred in 21 patients (1.1%) within 60 days of telephone treatment, two thirds of which likely represented treatment failures. This is similar to rates in control groups of other studies. Fourteen women (1.5%) received care for sexually transmitted diseases or other gynecologic conditions, primarily bacterial vaginitis, within 60 days of telephone treatment. Of note, 6% of the cohort were elderly, diabetic, taking glucocorticoids or early in pregnancy and are typically excluded from other studies. This higher-risk group did not have an increased incidence of either sepsis or pyelonephritis.6 No increase in adverse outcomes was seen in another study of a telephone treatment protocol.7

Several studies6-8 have noted that telephone treatment protocols increase the use of protocol-recommended antibiotics (eg, generally less expensive agents such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), which may help limit resistance to fluoroquinolones. However, specific data are not available.

McIssac et al9 reviewed a cohort of 231 women presenting to family physicians’ offices with uncomplicated cystitis symptoms. Empiric therapy resulted in approximately 40% of women unnecessarily receiving antibiotics. Treating only women with classic cystitis symptoms and pyuria would have decreased the unnecessary use of antibiotics to 26.2%, but fewer women with confirmed cystitis would have received immediate antibiotics (66.4% vs 91.8%). They derived a clinical decision rule designed to balance false positives and false negatives. It recommends immediate antibiotic treatment if women have ≥2 of 4 signs or symptoms: dysuria, leukocyte esterase (greater than trace), positive nitrites, or blood (greater than trace) on dipstick (LR+=2.29). Otherwise the rule recommends a culture to guide antibiotic therapy. This decision rule would have reduced unnecessary antibiotic use by 27.5% while ensuring that more women with confirmed UTIs received immediate antibiotics (81.3%).

In 1999, Saint et al8 estimated savings of $367,000 for 147,000 women enrolled over 1 year after widespread guideline implementation. Two cost-effectiveness studies10,11 of office treatment concluded that empiric treatment without additional testing is the least costly option in this setting. However, a recent, comprehensive cost-effectiveness study11 concluded that if a patient presents to an office, the marginal cost of performing a pelvic examination and urine culture for women with a negative dipstick was relatively low ($4 to $32 per symptom day avoided).

TABLE 2
Diagnosis of urinary tract infection

DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIALR+LR–SUMMARY LR
Presenting to medical care with possible UTI  19.0
Dysuria1.50.5 
Frequency1.80.6 
Hematuria2.00.9 
Recurrent UTI symptoms for a woman with history of UTI4.00.0 
Vaginal discharge or irritation0.2–0.32.7–3.1 
Dysuria, frequency, and absence of vaginal discharge or irritation  24.6
Dysuria absent, + vaginal discharge  0.3
Dysuria and + vaginal discharge  0.7
+ Leukocytes* or + nitrate on urine dipstick analysis4.20.3 
“UTI Rule”  2.3
* Leukocyte greater than trace on dipstick
† Leukocytes negative and nitrite negative
‡ “UTI Rule”—positive if 2 or more present: dysuria,+ leukocytes, + nitrate, + heme (> trace)
LR, likelihood ratio; UTI, urinary tract infection.
Adapted from Bent et al, JAMA 2002.1

Recommendations from others

A 2002 Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement guideline12 advised offering telephone treatment of uncomplicated UTI for low-risk patients if preferred by both provider and patient.