ADVERTISEMENT

Urine drug screening: A guide to monitoring Tx with controlled substances

The Journal of Family Practice. 2021 April;70(3):112-120 | 10.12788/jfp.0168
Author and Disclosure Information

Avoid error by ordering the appropriate test at a risk-based frequency. Be alert to sources of false-positives and adulteration. Be careful not to overreact to unexpected results.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

› Consider developing a risk-based urine drug testing protocol for all patients who are on chronic opioid therapy. C

› Consider urine drug testing to augment a thorough history when identifying and offering treatment to patients with a substance use disorder. A

› Do not change your management plan based on results of a single screening urine test. Revisit unexpected positive or negative results with a thorough history or confirmatory testing. A

Strength of recommendation (SOR)

A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series

Test results should be presented in an objective, nonconfrontational, and compassionate manner, not with stigmatizing language, such as “clean” or “dirty.”1,13,14 Using stigmatizing terms such as “substance abuser” instead of “person with a substance use disorder” has been shown, even among highly trained health care professionals, to have a negative effect on patient care.13

A given patient might well be using a substance, but if the specimen was obtained outside the detection window, a false-negative result might be reported.

Inevitably, you will encounter an unexpected result, and therefore must develop a rational, systematic, and compassionate management approach. “Unexpected result” is a broad term that includes results that conflict with

  • a patient’s self-report
  • your understanding of what the patient is taking (using)
  • prescribed medications
  • a patient’s typical substance use pattern.

When faced with an unexpected test result, first, ensure that the result in question is reliable. If a screening test yields an unanticipated finding—especially if it conflicts with the patient’s self-reporting—make every effort to seek confirmation if you are going to be making a significant clinical decision because of the result.1,14

Second, use your understanding of interference to consider the result in a broader context. If confirmatory results are inconsistent with a patient’s self-report, discuss whether there has been a break in the ­ph­ysician–patient relationship and emphasize that recurrent use or failure to adhere to a treatment plan has clear consequences.1,14 Modify the treatment plan to address the inconsistent finding by escalating care, adjusting medications, and connecting the patient to additional resources.

Third, keep in mind that a positive urine test is not diagnostic of an SUD. Occasional drug use is extremely common17 and should not categorically lead to a change in the treatment plan. Addiction is, fundamentally, a disease of disordered reward, motivation, and behavior that is defined by the consequences of substance use, not substance use per se,25 and an SUD diagnosis is complex, based on clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory testing. Similarly, a negative UDS result does not rule out an SUD.4,10

Continue to: Fourth, patient dismissal...