ADVERTISEMENT

Primary prevention of VTE spans a spectrum

The Journal of Family Practice. 2020 October;69(8):386-388, 390-395 | 10.12788/jfp.0084
Author and Disclosure Information

High mortality from VTE makes primary prevention appealing. Guidelines and assessment tools offer a variety of patient-specific strategies and agents.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

› Consider the mild reduction in the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) provided by statins when contemplating their use for cardiovascular disease prevention. B

› Avoid testing for thrombophilia to determine the risk of VTE, except in pregnant patients who meet criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome or have a family history of VTE. B

› Recommend an intrauterine device or progestin-only pill for contraception if the patient’s risk of VTE is high. B

› Stratify hospitalized medical and nonorthopedic surgical patients by risk score to determine the need for VTE prophylaxis. B

Strength of recommendation (SOR)

A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series

Trauma: VTE risk increases with severity

Trauma increases the risk of VTE considerably. A national study showed that 1.5% of admitted trauma patients experienced VTE during hospitalization and that 1.2% were readmitted for VTE within 1 year.49 As many as 32% of trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit experience VTE despite appropriate prophylaxis.50 A Cochrane Review51 found that:

  • prophylaxis significantly reduces DVT risk
  • pharmacotherapeutic prophylaxis is more effective than mechanical prophylaxis
  • LMWH is more effective than LDUH.

Guidelines recommend that major trauma patients receive prophylaxis with LMWH, LDUH, or IPC.46

CORRESPONDENCE
Michael J. Arnold, MD, CDR, MC, USN; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Jacksonville, FL 32214; michael.arnold@usuhs.edu.