The benefits of doing ultrasound exams in your office
Family medicine ultrasound is more accurate, more cost-effective, and less time-consuming than you might imagine. Here’s how it can improve your care.
Guiding joint injections, assessing LV function
Sports/exercise medicine. FPs with expertise in sports and exercise medicine commonly use office ultrasound to diagnose musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries, including rotator cuff tears, muscle ruptures, tendinitis, and bursitis.26 It is superior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of cost-to-benefit ratio, precision, and sensitivity (due, in part, to the fact that clinicians can obtain patient feedback during the examination).26 In addition, a review of office-based procedures for MSK indications demonstrated the usefulness of ultrasound for the guidance of joint aspirations and joint and tendon injections.27 Ultrasound guidance is commonly used to ensure procedural accuracy during aspirations and injections of the shoulder (glenohumeral joint; subacromial bursa), elbow, wrist (carpal tunnel tendons), hip, knee, and ankle.27-29
Cardiology (FIGURE 3). General practitioners in Norway found that 8 hours of training on a hand-held ultrasound device was sufficient to assess left ventricular function with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 83%, respectively.30 Their measurements of septal mitral annular excursion (a surrogate measurement of left ventricular function) were similar to those of a cardiologist using the same device and added no more than 5 minutes to the examination.
,
Other uses. In a separate study, military FPs with 16 hours of training found that FAMUS was easy to learn and effective in the outpatient and inpatient setting for the detection of AAA, trauma, musculoskeletal injuries, and certain obstetric, echocardiographic, and biliary indications.31 They reported that the average time spent per ultrasound examination was one to 5 minutes for the majority of the indications.
The authors of a retrospective study involving a suburban family practice reported that FAMUS was successfully used to identify the causes of epigastric and right upper quadrant pain, and to check post-void residual urinary bladder volume.32
The ultrasound-assisted physical examination can detect pathologies not apparent on history and physical examination alone (FIGURES 4 and 5). In one study, an FP used ultrasound in the office to identify pathologies in 31% of patients that were not detected on physical examination alone. The pathologies included AAAs, a thyroid cyst, mitral stenosis, gallstones, renal cysts, urinary retention, hydronephrosis, ectopic kidney, and an endometrial tumor.33
 |  |
In another study, an FP performed ultrasound examinations on 189 patients during their annual exams.34 The technology identified pathologies that were not suspected after clinical assessment in 22% of these patients. With the emphasis in the current clinical landscape on choosing diagnostic tests wisely, it will be important to determine if findings like these positively impact patient care.35,36
Portable ultrasound machines are affordable
The relative affordability of portable ultrasound contributes to the cost-effectiveness of FAMUS. For FPs seeking to initiate an office-based ultrasound program, expenses to consider include the price of the machine itself, which ranges from $7500 to $50,000, depending on the technology included. Other expenses include the cost of disposables (eg, ultrasound gel and disinfectant wipes or spray), which may total about $400 per year.
In-office exams facilitate savings elsewhere. Other factors that contribute to the cost-effectiveness of FAMUS include reduced radiologist expenses and hospital visits. The cost savings of in-office ultrasound was highlighted almost 30 years ago when the cost of a FAMUS obstetrical scan was reported to be half that of a radiologist scan.23 This same study reported that increased costs for additional investigations caused by incidental findings using FAMUS could be offset by the decreased costs associated with an earlier diagnosis of serious conditions.23
A 2002 study demonstrated that office-based FAMUS scans (N=131) reduced the number of hospital scans, emergency admissions, and outpatient and inpatient hospital visits.37 Although the unit cost of a FAMUS scan was higher than an inpatient one, the total cost of the FAMUS scan was lower due to decreased hospital visits. In addition, research has shown that patients are more satisfied with office-based ultrasound examinations and prefer ultrasound performed by their FP to hospital-based ultrasound scans.31,37
