An Update on Cutaneous Angiosarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) is a rare aggressive malignancy that most commonly manifests in White men older than 60 years and often appears as an enlarging ecchymosis on the head, neck, or scalp. Surgery with negative margins is the first-line treatment. The role of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is uncertain but can be used in smaller, well-circumscribed lesions on the head and neck. The greatest impact that dermatologists can have in the management of CAS is through a thorough total-body skin examination and heightened awareness resulting in a shortened time to diagnosis. Until quality evidence allows for the creation of consensus guidelines, multidisciplinary care at a cancer center that specializes in rare difficult-to-treat tumors is essential in optimizing patient outcomes
PRACTICE POINTS
- Dermatologists should be aware of challenges in diagnosing cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) due to its clinical similarity to benign entities such as ecchymosis and hemangioma.
- Surgery with negative margins is the first-line treatment of CAS with the best prognosis.
- Mohs micrographic surgery is useful for well-defined lesions measuring less than 5 cm on the head and neck; however, further studies are needed to determine its use in other areas.
- Paraffin-embedded sections may be more reliable than frozen sections in determining margin clearance.
Mohs Micrographic Surgery—Mohs micrographic surgery is the standard of care for many aggressive cutaneous malignancies on the head, but its utility for the treatment of CAS is uncertain. Only a few studies have compared the efficacy of MMS vs wide local excision (WLE). There have been reports of recurrence-free follow-up at 12, 16, 18, 20, and 72 months after MMS.31-36 The latter case showed a patient who underwent MMS with a 72-month relapse-free survival, whereas other patients who underwent WLE only survived 5 to 7 months without recurrence.36 In another study, there was a local recurrence rate of 42.9% after a median follow-up of 4 years in 7 patients with CAS treated with complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment, which is less than the reported recurrence rates of 72% to 84% after standard excisional procedures.28,37
Houpe et al38 conducted a systematic review of the use of WLE vs MMS; the median overall survival was longest for WLE in conjunction with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy at 39.3 months, followed by MMS alone at 37 months. Mohs micrographic surgery in conjunction with chemotherapy and radiotherapy was used in 1 patient, with a median overall survival of 82 months. Wide local excision alone resulted in a median overall survival of 19.8 months. Although these data are promising and suggest that the combination of surgery with adjuvant therapy may be more beneficial than surgery alone, it is important to note that there were only 9 cases treated with MMS compared with 825 cases treated with WLE.38
Several studies have documented that paraffin-embedded sections may be more useful than frozen sections in the determination of margin positivity from a surgical specimen, as frozen sections showed a poor negative predictive value of 33.3%.7,35 Mohs micrographic surgery has been proposed for tumors measuring less than 5 cm; however, the most recent appropriate use criteria for MMS of the American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Mohs Surgery, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association, and American Society for Mohs Surgery deemed the use of MMS for angiosarcoma uncertain.32,33,37 Further research is necessary to elucidate the role of MMS in the management of CAS.
Radiotherapy—Radiotherapy is a common adjuvant to surgical resection but has been used palliatively in patients with tumors that are unresectable. Improved local control and disease-free survival have been observed with the combination of radiation and surgery. A dose response to radiotherapy has been demonstrated,18,30 with 1 study showing that patients who received more than 5000 cGy of radiotherapy achieved better local control than patients who received 4500 cGy or less.18 Pawlik et al7 showed a decreased chance of death with the addition of adjunctive radiotherapy, and patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy demonstrated a median survival almost 4-times longer than patients who did not receive radiation. Morrison et al39 reported that radiation therapy administered to patients with no clinically evident disease after surgical resection resulted in improved local control and overall survival vs patients who were irradiated with clinically evident disease.
Complications of radiotherapy for angiosarcoma have been reported, including xerostomia, nonfunctionally significant fibrosis, chronic ulceration/cellulitis of the scalp, necrosis requiring debridement, severe ocular complications, and fibrosis of the eyelids requiring surgical intervention.14 Radiation therapy also poses unique risks to patients with radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the breast, as many of these patients have already received the maximum recommended dose of radiation in the affected areas and additional radiation could exacerbate their CAS.
Chemotherapy—Chemotherapy occasionally is used as an adjunct to surgical resection with positive margins or as palliative care when surgical resection is not possible. Unfortunately, STSs have a response rate of less than 40% to standard chemotherapy.40 Studies in which the use of chemotherapy is evaluated for CAS have mixed results. Mark et al18 reported no significant overall survival benefit when comparing CAS treated with surgery plus radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Torres et al41 evaluated radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the breast and found a reduced risk for local recurrence in patients receiving chemotherapy in addition to surgery, indicating that chemotherapy may be useful in this subset of patients when radiation is not recommended.
Cytotoxic chemotherapy agents such as paclitaxel, doxorubicin, or doxorubicin in combination with mesna and ifosfamide (MAI) are common.39 Median progression-free survival is 5.4 months, 4 to 5.6 months, and 3.9 months for MAI, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin, respectively.8,9,42-46 Improved prognosis with MAI may indicate that combination chemotherapy regimens are more effective than single-agent regimens. Cutaneous angiosarcomas may respond better to paclitaxel than doxorubicin, and angiosarcomas of the scalp and face have shown a better response to paclitaxel.47,48