Periocular Fillers and Related Anatomy
Aging of the periocular area involves changes of the skin, muscle, fat, and bones. Facial fillers can be helpful in minimizing these changes by restoring youthful fullness to periocular areas that have undergone volume loss or loss of support. Physicians should understand the complicated anatomy surrounding the eyes, both to understand the aging process and to minimize treatment complications.
Practice Points
- When performing periocular dermal injections, physicians should understand the complicated anatomy surrounding the eyes and related changes with upper face aging.
- The different rheological properties of facial fillers impact product selection for various areas of the upper face.
- Physicians should be aware of the anatomical danger zones to avoid intravascular embolization.
Dermal Fillers for Periocular Rejuvenation
Hyaluronic acid (HA) was first pioneered for use in humans in the late 1970s by ophthalmologists for anterior segment surgery.13-15 Biocompatibility for orthopedic and dermal applications was explored in the early 1990s.16
At this time, no dermal filler is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in the periorbital area. Some fillers are approved for subdermal areas extending to the preperiosteal plane and can be used in the midface such as HA fillers (eg, Restylane Lyft [Galderma Laboratories, LP]), Juvéderm Voluma XC [Allergan, Inc]), poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA). No dermal fillers are approved for use in the forehead, glabella, or temples. Their use is becoming increasingly popular but is considered off label. In addition, cannulas are not approved for use in these areas. Cannulas may be beneficial in that they are thought to create less bruising and have less chance of entering a vessel than needles, but some injectors prefer needles because they are stiffer and therefore more precise.
The ideal filler for the tear trough, superior sulcus, ROOF, over the orbitomalar ligament, forehead, and glabella is one that is somewhat moldable but does not migrate, is not hydrophilic, is smooth to inject, and is reversible should there be any complications. No single filler fits this ideal description, but HAs typically are the first choice.
,In vitro studies to determine the stiffness (G') and the ability to flow (viscosity) have been performed.17,18 Calcium hydroxylapatite has the most stiffness, while Belotero Balance (Merz Aesthetics) and Juvéderm Ultra XC (Allergan, Inc) are more soft17 (Table). These guidelines are important but may not correlate directly with how the fillers behave in vivo as demonstrated in animal models.18

Hyaluronic acid fillers are produced by different technologies to create their cross-link patterns with 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether, which determines, to some degree, their behavior in human tissue. Fillers are either monophasic; monodensified; formed by Hylacross (Juvéderm), Vycross (Juvéderm Voluma XC, Juvéderm Volbella XC), or cohesive polydensified matrix technology (Belotero Balance), or biphasic, formed by nonanimal stabilized HA sieving technology (Restylane family). Biopsy has demonstrated that monophasic fillers tend to percolate through and integrate into the tissue, while biphasic fillers dissect tissue to the sides to create a potential space for the filler to reside (Table).24
Periocular Injection Considerations
An experienced injector is one who has developed not only an artistic eye for the face and excellent sense of anatomy but also has a sensitive ability to predict the filler-tissue interaction based on tactile feedback dependent on 3 main qualities: (1) stiffness and viscosity of the filler, (2) gauge of the needle or cannula, and (3) depth of the needle in the tissue. Periocular injections of dermal fillers can be delivered with needles or cannulas, diluted or undiluted. Smaller-gauge needles require more force than larger-gauge needles and cannulas that flow more freely. A needle in the dense dermis will require more force than one placed in the loose subcutaneous space.
The tear trough is generally preferable to fill with a mid-level G' HA filler that is less apt to migrate. A neutral gaze during the injection is preferred because closing or moving the eyes can distort the position of the inferior orbital fat-pads (Figure 1). A needle or cannula can be used, diluted or undiluted. The tear trough can be filled with the injection directed horizontally or vertically via a fanning technique. If needles are used, the skin should be stretched to view the 3 to 5 vertical veins and then the needle should be advanced beneath them to avoid bruising. Avoidance of hydrophilic fillers in the tear trough is important to avoid edema. The superior sulcus can be filled both anteriorly and posteriorly to the septum, which is a highly advanced injection for experienced injectors because of the proximity to the supratrochlear and supraorbital arteries as well as the superior ophthalmic vein (Figure 2). Sharp creases such as deep lateral periocular rhytides known as crow’s-feet are nicely filled with intradermal HAs with a low G'.

