ADVERTISEMENT

Therapies for Actinic Keratosis With a Focus on Cosmetic Outcomes

Cutis. 2015 September;96(3):165-172, 193
Author and Disclosure Information

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a commonly encountered premalignant epidermal lesion that has a predilection to manifest on highly visible areas such as the face, head, and hands. Lesions may be cosmetically unappealing and have been reported to reduce patients’ quality of life (QOL), but appropriate treatment can resolve these issues. In this article, we review the efficacy of the most commonly utilized treatments for AKs including topical medications, procedural modalities, and light-based therapies, and we discuss the relevant cosmetic considerations and outcomes.

Practice Points

  • In addition to their risk for progression to malignancy, actinic keratoses (AKs) can have negative impacts on cosmetic appearance and quality of life.
  • A variety of topical medications, procedural modalities, and light-based therapies are available for treatment of AKs, which offer varying degrees of efficacy for clearance of lesions and cosmetic outcomes. Based on the current data, imiquimod and photodynamic therapy are the treatments most likely to provide an excellent cosmetic outcome.

Fractional photothermolysis is a relatively new advancement in the field of laser therapy that has received FDA approval for the treatment of AK.56 This treatment works by creating multiple noncontiguous microscopic columns of thermal injury while sparing adjacent zones of viable tissue.57 Although there are limited studies involving the use of such lasers in the treatment of AK, initial findings suggest that 1927-nm thulium lasers may be more effective than 1550-nm erbium lasers in achieving lesion clearance. A trial of 14 participants who received 5 laser treatments with a 1550-nm fractionated erbium-doped fiber laser reported an average reduction in AK counts of 66.2% at 3 months follow-up and a 55.6% reduction at 6 months follow-up. A participant-determined marked or very significant improvement of lesions was reported in 83% of participants at 1 month posttreatment but only in 44% of participants at 6 months posttreatment.58 A similar trial of 24 participants treated with up to 4 treatment sessions of the fractionated 1927-nm thulium laser reported an 87.3% reduction in number of AKs at 3 months follow-up and an 86.6% reduction at 
6 months follow-up.56 The primary advantage of fractional laser therapy is a faster recovery period generally lasting only 2 or 3 days as compared to 
2 weeks or more with traditional ablative lasers, thus limiting the amount of time a patient must tolerate cosmetically unappealing erythema.59,60 The quick recovery time has been attributed to the fractional laser’s ability to preserve the stratum corneum and skin barrier, which also helps reduce the risk for other AEs such as scarring and infection.56,59-61 Additional studies are needed to better assess the true efficacy of fractional laser therapy, but treatment with the fractional 1927-nm thulium laser appears to be a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic option for treatment of AK with similar efficacy to traditional ablative lasers but with a lower risk of AEs.

Photodynamic TherapyPhotodynamic therapy (PDT) is an FDA-approved treatment that involves the use of a topical photosensitizing agent such as 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminovulinate (MAL) before exposure to an activating light source to generate reactive oxygen species that lead to cell death.62-65 Multiple PDT regimens with varying combinations of photosensitizers, incubation time, and light sources have been studied, but a 
2012 Cochrane review determined that treatment with conventional formulations of MAL and ALA with either blue- or red-light PDT were similarly efficacious for treatment of individual AKs as compared to vehicle with blue- or red-light PDT. One exception was that longer incubation time (ie, 4 hours) with ALA resulted in better results than shorter incubation times (ie, 0.5, 1, 2 hours) with ALA.66

Standard PDT treatment with MAL also has consistently demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving complete clearance rates in addition to superior cosmetic outcomes over treatment with either cryotherapy, DFS, or 5-FU.67-73 Three studies in particular noted an excellent or good investigator-determined cosmetic outcome in 96% to 98% of participants treated with MAL-PDT.69,71,74 Photodynamic therapy with ALA also has been reported as superior over CO2 laser ablation for AK reduction as well as both patient and investigator overall satisfaction.75

More recently, several methods of improving photosensitizer delivery have been studied, which have demonstrated remarkable efficacy at achieving lesion clearance over standard cream formulations or application routines. One such method involves the use of gentle heating to increase photosensitizer uptake. In a split-extremity study of 20 participants who were treated with 20% ALA under occlusion for 1 hour with one side heated to 38.8°C, the heated side demonstrated significant (P<.0001) efficacy at achieving higher median clearance rates over control when evaluated at 2 and 6 months posttherapy.76 Notably, occlusion of ALA in itself during the incubation period also has been demonstrated to significantly (P<.0001) improve clearance rates.77 Another method involves the use of a new nanoemulsion-based formulation of 
ALA gel, known as BF-200 ALA, which has demonstrated remarkable efficacy over standard 
MAL cream and placebo in a long-term follow-up 
analysis of 2 prospective, randomized, controlled trials.78 In a similar vein, 3 prospective randomized trials with a minimum follow-up time of 3 months demonstrated that MAL-PDT in combination with fractional ablative laser pretreatment has significant (P<.02 in all trials) efficacy over MAL-PDT without pretreatment in achieving complete AK clearance. Although the cosmetic outcomes were good or excellent in 87% to 100% of patients, they were not significantly different from stand-alone 
MAL-PDT treatment in any of the trials.79-81 However, pretreatment with microneedling in MAL-PDT has been shown to achieve superior cosmetic outcomes over 
MAL-PDT without microneedling, according to one small split-face study of 10 participants.82