ADVERTISEMENT

Prostate Cancer

Clinician Reviews. 2011 January;21(1):28-34
Author and Disclosure Information

Prostate cancer incidence continues to rise by about 1% per year in the United States, with 192,000 new cases diagnosed in 2009. As increasing numbers of men follow recommendations to undergo PSA testing and digital rectal examination, the chances of detecting cancer still confined to the prostate—with optimal chances for a cure—also increase. How can clinicians help each patient make the best decisions regarding screening, biopsy, and (when required) treatment for the cancer that is second most common among US men?


New strategies to differentiate between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors would have substantial public heath benefits. Tools for clinical and patient use should be developed to support informed decisions regarding prevention, screening, and biopsy, and to tailor treatments to tumor biology.6 Patients at high risk for prostate cancer should be identified in order to take preventive measures that will improve survival in this group.

REFERENCES

1. Lippman SM, Klein EA, Goodman PJ, et al. Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA. 2009;301(1):39-51.

2. Kohli M, Tindall DJ. New developments in the medical management of prostate cancer. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(1):77-86.

3. Huncharek M, Haddock KS, Reid R, Kupelnick B. Smoking as a risk factor for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(4):693-701.

4. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(4):225-229.

5. Sanda MG, Kaplan ID. A 64-year-old man with low-risk prostate cancer: review of prostate cancer treatment. JAMA. 2009;301(20):2141-2151.

6. Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA. 2009;302(15):1685-1692.

7. Talcott JA, Rossi C, Shipley WU, et al. Patient-reported long-term outcomes after conventional and high-dose combination proton and photon radiation for early prostate cancer. JAMA. 2010;303(11):1046-1053.

8. Odedina FT, Akinremi TO, Chinegwundoh F, et al. Prostate cancer disparities in black men of African descent: a comparative literature review of prostate cancer burden among black men in the United States, Caribbean, United Kingdom, and West Africa. Infect Agent Cancer. 2009; 4(suppl 1):S2.

9. Ben-Shlomo Y, Evans S, Ibrahim F, et al. The risk of prostate cancer amongst black men in the United Kingdom: the PROCESS cohort study. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):99-105.

10. Spickett I, Robertson J. Prostate cancer: the ongoing challenge. Prim Health Care. 2010;20(2): 16-21.

11. Litman HJ, Steers WD, Wei JT, et al. Relationship of lifestyle and clinical factors to lower urinary tract symptoms: results from Boston Area Community Health survey. Urology. 2007;70(5): 916-921.

12. Jones C, Jill J, Chapple C; Guideline Development Group. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2010 May 19;340:c2354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2354.

13. American Urological Association. Prostate Specific Antigen Best Practice Update: 2009 Update. www.auanet.org/content/guidelines-and-quality-care/clinical-guidelines/main-reports/psa09.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2010.

14. Bostwick DG, Burke HB, Djakiew D, et al. Human prostate cancer risk factors. Cancer. 2004;101(10 Suppl):2371-2490.

15. Cooperberg MR, Moul JS, Carroll PR. The changing face of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(32):8146-8151.

16. Krane LS, Patel MN, Hemal AK. Advances and future directions in management of prostate cancer. Indian J Surg. 2009;71(6):337-341.

17. Collin SM, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Associations of sexual dysfunction symptoms with PSA-detected localised and prostate cancer: a case-control study nested within the UK population-based ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) study. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(18):3254-3261.

18. National Health Service Cancer Screening Programmes. Information for primary care; PSA testing in asymptomatic men (2010). www.cancer screening.nhs.uk/prostate/pcrmp-guide-2.html. Accessed December 21, 2010.

19. Schaeffer EM, Carter HB, Kettermann A, et al. Prostate specific antigen testing among the elderly—when to stop? J Urol. 2009;181(4):1606-1614.

20. National Institute on Aging. BLSA: Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging; NCT00233272. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00233272. Accessed December 21, 2010.

21. Fillée C, Tombal B, Philippe M. Prostate cancer screening: clinical impact of WHO calibration of Beckman Coulter Access prostate-specific antigen assays. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48(2):285-288.

22. Ferrini R, Woolf SH. Screening for prostate cancer in American men: American College of Preventive Medicine Practice Policy Statement. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15(1):81-84.

23. Wolf AMD, Wender RC, Etzioni RB, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(2):70-98.

24. Melia J, Coulson P, Coleman D, Moss S. Urological referral of asymptomatic men in general practice in England. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(7):1176-1181.

25. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. PCRMP Guide No 2. Information for primary care: PSA testing in asymptomatic men (evidence document, Jan 2010). www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/prostate/pcrmp-guide-2.html. Accessed December 21, 2010.

26. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™: Prostate cancer. V.3.2010. www.nccn.org/profes sionals/physician_gls/PDF/prostate.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2010.

27. Terakawa T, Miyake, H, Kanomata N, et al. Inverse association between histologic inflammation in needle biopsy specimens and prostate cancer in men with serum PSA of 10-50 ng/mL. Urology. 2008;72(6):1194-1197.

28. Makarov DV, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, et al. Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL. J Urol. 2006;176 (2):554-558.