Osteoarticular pain affects CML patients stopping TKI

Patients with a previous history of osteoarticular symptoms were more likely to experience WS—22.9%, compared to 9.8% without a previous history (P=0.002).

Most patients were receiving imatinib—323 without WS and 100 with WS. The 1 patient receiving dasatinib had no WS. And of the 4 patients receiving nilotinib, 2 had WS and 2 didn’t.

And so the type of TKI therapy—dasatinib, imatinib, or nilotinib—was not significant (P=0.42).

Investigators performed a multivariate analysis adjusted for gender, CML duration, and Sokal score, and 2 risk factors emerged: previous history of osteoarticular symptoms (relative risk: 2.08) and time on TKI (relative risk: 2.23).

Discussion

Dr Rousselot compared the Richter trial (Richter et al, JCO 2014) to the current study and noted that the Richter trial, with an enrollment of 50 patients, had a WS prevalence of 30%. But the current trial had a prevalence of 24%.

The difference in WS may be due to time on TKI, Dr Rousselot said, as patients in the Richter trial were on TKI treatment for a longer period of time.

“The time of onset is the same [in both trials],” Dr Rousselot said, as are the TKI used, location of pain, and duration of pain.

“So what we can say is [with] shorter TKI treatment . . . , we have a higher risk of molecular relapse but a lower risk of withdrawal syndrome.”

And with longer TKI treatment, the converse appears to be true. It reduces the risk of molecular relapse but raises the risk of withdrawal syndrome.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.