Drug allows for treatment-free periods in PV
They all had the JAK2V617F mutation. Some patients had additional mutations, including TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, CBL, and EZH2, among others.
“One patient had an inactivating p53 mutation,” Dr Mascarenhas said. “I didn’t know this when we put her on study. . . , but this is an interesting part of the study. So remember, one patient had an inactivating p53 mutation in a trial where I’m using a drug that interrupts wild-type p53-MDM2 interaction.”
Efficacy
Plasma MIC-1 levels were significantly increased (P=0.004) in PV patients following treatment with idasanutlin at day 5 compared to day 1. MIC-1 is a secreted protein strongly induced by activated p53.
“Some patients didn’t need to be treated every month,” Dr Mascarenhas said. “They got treatment holidays. That’s unique. I don’t usually see that in the treatments that we give. In fact, this one person here, after 3 cycles, didn’t need to be re-treated for 9 months.”
In the 100 mg cohort (n=6), patients received a median of 8 cycles of idasanutlin (range, 7-13) and were on study for a median of 34.1 weeks (range, 29.0–127.3). One patient experienced a treatment holiday of 1 month, and another patient had a treatment holiday of more than 3 consecutive months.
In the 150 mg cohort (n=6), patients received a median of 9.5 cycles of therapy (range, 5–17) and were on study for a median of 52.1 weeks (range, 23.1–72.9). Three patients experienced a 1-month treatment holiday, and 1 patient had a 2- to 3-month treatment holiday.
In total, 6 patients continued the single-agent regimen, and 4 proceeded to the combination treatment with pegylated IFN.
Reasons for discontinuation were patient refusal and investigator decision.
The ORR (CR + PR) for both dose cohorts with single-agent idasanutlin was 58%. One patient was not evaluable, 4 had no response, 3 had a PR, and 4 had a CR.
In the combination portion of the study, the ORR was 50%. One patient was not evaluable, 1 had no response, 1 had a PR, and 1 had a CR.
“The 1 non-responder in Part B,” Dr Mascarenhas noted, “was the p53-mutated patient. Makes sense.”
The ORR for both the single-agent and combination parts of the study was 75%.
Eight of 12 patients had a 50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline, which is considered clinically meaningful, according to Dr Mascarenhas.
“What’s also interesting,” he pointed out, “[ is that] patients who didn’t obtain a response also enjoyed symptom benefit.”
Patients had a median 43% reduction in JAK2 mutation from baseline.
“One patient had nearly 92% reduction in JAK2V617F,” Dr Mascarenhas said. “One patient had a 60% increase. But guess what? That was the p53-mutated patient. Makes sense.”
Bone morphology showed reduction in marrow hypercellularity and normalization of megakaryocyte atypia and clustering.
Safety
There were no DLTs with either dose of idasanutlin.
“This was a well-tolerated drug,” Dr Mascarenhas said.
Three patients experienced grade 3 non-hematologic treatment-emergent AEs, all at 100 mg, of fatigue (1 patient), headache (1 patient), and pain (1 patient).
No grade 4 non-hematologic treatment-emergent AEs occurred at either dose, and investigators observed no hematologic AE of any grade.
Investigators also observed no grade 3–4 gastrointestinal (GI) treatment-emergent AEs. Constipation (91.7%), nausea (75%), and diarrhea (66.7%) were the most frequent grade 1 or 2 events. Patients received GI prophylaxis upfront with ondansetron, lorazepam, or dexamethasone.
Because of the safety profile and manageable GI toxicity, the higher dose of idasanutlin was chosen as the recommended phase 2 dose.