ADVERTISEMENT

How to avoid 3 common errors in dementia screening

The Journal of Family Practice. 2014 August;63(8):E1-E7
Author and Disclosure Information

The simple solutions outlined here will help you to sharpen your evaluative tools and improve accuracy.

TABLE 4
Trail Making: Outdated norms vs current norms

Version 1 – No corrections for age or education for MMSE or COWAT; outdated Trail Making norms

Test Score Results Suggests dementia

MMSE

26

≥24 within normal limits10

No

COWAT

16

>15 within normal limits25

No

Trail Making A

80 secs

50th percentile32

No

Trail Making B

196 secs

50th percentile32

No

Decision: Negative for dementia

Version 2 – Applied age and education corrections for MMSE and COWAT; current Trail Making norms

Test Score Results Suggests dementia

MMSE

26

Expected = 2822

Yes

COWAT

16

38th percentile28

Yes

Trail Making A

80 secs

<1st percentile31

Yes

Trail Making B

196 secs

<2nd percentile31

Yes

Decision: Positive for dementia

COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Task; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.

Patients deserve an accurate assessment


A diagnosis of dementia profoundly affects patients and families. Progressive dementia such as Alzheimer’s disease means an individual will spend the rest of his or her life (usually 8-10 years) with decreasing cognitive capacity and quality of life.33-35 It also means families will spend years providing or arranging for care, and watching their family member deteriorate. Early detection can afford affected individuals and families the opportunity to make plans for fulfilling wishes and dreams before increased impairment makes such plans unattainable. The importance of rigor in assessment is therefore essential.

Even seemingly minor deviations in screening test procedures can contaminate results as surely as using nonsterile containers in biologic testing.

Optimizing accuracy in screening for dementia also can enable physicians to reasonably reassure patients that they likely do not suffer from a dementia at the present time, or to at least recommend that they be further assessed by a specialist. Without rigor, time and resources are wasted and the important question that triggered the referral is neither satisfactorily—nor accurately—addressed. Thus, there is a need to use not just simple cutoff scores but to apply the most current age and education normative data, and adhere to administrative instructions verbatim.

CORRESPONDENCE
Lindy A. Kilik, PhD, Geriatric Psychiatry Program, Providence Care Mental Health Services, PO Bag 603, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 4X3; kilikl@queensu.ca