Commentary

Glucose self-monitoring: Necessary—or not?


 

References

I read the article on glucose self-monitoring (“Glucose self-monitoring: Think twice for type 2 patients,” J Fam Pract. 2008;57:731-734) with dismay. As a family physician for 20 years, having patients with newly diagnosed diabetes take ownership of this frightening and debilitating disease is one of the most difficult challenges I face. Your assertion that it is appropriate to ask such a patient not to monitor blood glucose levels strikes me as narrow and short-sighted.

Blood glucose readings help patients determine how well their efforts at control are working. If a patient’s glucose level jumps by several points, he or she needs to know why. A patient who can relate such changes to recent meals or activities gains vital information about self-control.

Readings taken by the patient and reported to the physician provide valuable information that can be used to further educate the patient about the effects of daily changes in diet and exercise. Daily readings can also keep the physician from making unwarranted medication changes, and help the patient and the physician focus on other means of achieving glycemic control.

The idea that patients who regularly check glucose levels somehow become more depressed than those who do not seems absurd. I can’t comment further on that aspect of the report without having the study data. I can say, however, that your article completely avoids any acknowledgement of physician-patient team efforts to control diabetes and shows little regard for the importance of treating the patient as a whole person.

Jack Aldridge, DO
Inola Family Clinic
Inola, Okla

Drs. Mendoza and Hickner respond

Your perspective is a valuable one, and one that’s shared by many of us when we discover that new scientific evidence does not support something we’ve always done.

We agree that education in self-management should be provided to all patients with diabetes at the time of diagnosis, and as needed thereafter.1 It seems intuitive that patients with newly diagnosed diabetes would want to check their blood sugar and that additional information about patients’ blood glucose levels ought to guide medication decisions and improve overall glycemic control.

Yet the ESMON study found otherwise. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this well-done randomized controlled trial showed that routine self-monitoring did not improve patients’ glycemic control, compared to less frequent monitoring at office visits.2 The study does not say, however, that self-monitoring of blood glucose should be tossed out the window, and we did not mean to imply that.

Our point is that self-monitoring need not be routine, but that it should be a management option for patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin-requiring diabetes. My practice (MM) has been to recommend self-monitoring only to those who are at greater risk for hypoglycemia. I’ve found that many patients feel a sense of relief when they learn that they do not have to check blood sugars every day and that, with less emphasis on the numbers, I can address the whole person more effectively. I am able to spend more time addressing patient concerns and providing education on diet, exercise, and related health issues—and patients achieve good blood sugar control without self-monitoring.

Michael D. Mendoza, MD, MPH
The University of Chicago

John Hickner, MD, MSc
Cleveland Clinic

Next Article: