ADVERTISEMENT

Intimate partner violence: How you can help female survivors

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2014 July;81(7):439-446 | 10.3949/ccjm.81a.13069
Author and Disclosure Information

ABSTRACTIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent, complex, and challenging women’s health problem associated with a number of negative medical, reproductive, and mental health conditions. When clinicians bring up the topic with their patients, patients are more likely to disclose. Supportive counseling and referrals are associated with improved safety and health.

KEY POINTS

  • Many victims of IPV will not present with injuries but may have medical or mental health issues related to their IPV experiences.
  • Addressing IPV with female patients not only results in increased identification of survivors but is also associated with cognitive and emotional benefits.
  • IPV information and resources should be provided to all women, regardless of IPV disclosure.
  • Clinicians should respond to a patient’s IPV disclosure with validation, support, respect, and information.
  • Clinicians must respect patients’ autonomy, as they are the ones who best understand their situation and know what they need. In some cases, leaving an abusive relationship can be more dangerous than staying.

A nonthreatening physical examination. Women who have experienced physical or sexual violence may feel anxious or experience added trauma during certain portions of the physical examination. Women who have been raped or otherwise sexually abused may have difficulty tolerating a pelvic examination, for example. Others who have been choked or grabbed by the neck may experience distress during palpation of the thyroid or cervical lymph nodes. The oropharyngeal examination may be challenging for women who have experienced forced oral sex or who may have had objects such as the barrel of a gun forced into their mouth. Asking women who have experienced IPV what aspects of the physical examination they may find difficult and how this could be made easier allows the patient and clinician to work together to develop strategies for or alternatives to necessary examinations or testing.

Before starting an examination, clinicians should explain what will happen and then ask the patient for her permission before moving on to the next step. Doing so creates a sense of control in an otherwise challenging and potentially traumatizing examination.

Disclosure of mandatory IPV reporting. Many states require health care providers to report any injuries caused by a weapon or criminal act to police or other official institutions.45,46 Several of these states specify that this reporting should occur during an IPV evaluation.

Mandatory reporting of IPV to police is highly controversial.47–49 Opponents of these laws argue that they do not benefit victims because they do not respect autonomy, they violate patient-clinician confidentiality, and they violate informed consent.47 Female IPV victims indicate that they would be less likely to disclose IPV and seek help if they knew it had to be reported.50–53 In a survey of California physicians, 59% stated that they might not comply with reporting laws if the patient objected.54

In states with mandatory reporting laws, clinicians can advocate for their patients by disclosing whether IPV must be reported before beginning their examination. The Michigan Coalition Against Domestic Violence devised this sample statement:

“I do have to let you know that under state law, I am obligated to make a police report to (name police agency with jurisdiction over the facility), if I/we are treating someone for any injury sustained by means of violence (tailor this information to the specifics of your state law). So, if you would have any concerns about that, I would encourage you to speak with one of the domestic violence advocates/counselors at (DV agency), who are able to provide confidential services and help without being required to make a police report.”55

The Compendium of State Statutes and Polices on Domestic Violence and Health Care by Futures Without Violence is an excellent reference that describes current state laws and policies regarding domestic violence and includes descriptions of the specific characteristics of each state’s mandatory reporting laws and their implications for health care providers. A copy can be downloaded from www.futureswithout-violence.org/content/features/detail/1584/.

What not to do

Clinicians should not ignore or minimize the extent of IPV, make excuses for the batterer, or blame the woman.32,56,57 They also should not inadvertently blame or criticize the woman by asking her, “What did you do to deserve this?” or “Why don’t you just leave?”57

While leaving a violent relationship is an obvious solution, many women experiencing IPV are either unwilling or unable to do so. In fact, leaving the batterer can be just as dangerous as staying. In a North Carolina study, half of all women killed by their partner had divorced or broken up with the partner immediately before the murder.4

What to do when a woman does not disclose IPV

Women who have experienced IPV often deny the violence to others out of fear. So a denial of violence, even in highly suspicious cases, can be expected. Abused patients often want help but are confused and afraid to ask for it.58,59 Providing easy and anonymous access to IPV information and resources through posters, flyers, brochures, and booklets will allow any woman—regardless of disclosure—to obtain help.36

In one IPV trial, all women in a family planning clinic who were in the intervention group were given information about IPV and how it can affect sexual and reproductive health, whether or not they disclosed. Compared with women in the control group, women who received the intervention—both those who did and did not experience IPV—were 63% more likely than those in the control group to end a relationship because they perceived it to be unhealthy or unsafe. In this case, all women—not just those who were victims—benefited from receiving information about IPV.60

PROVIDERS’ SUPPORT MAKES A DIFFERENCE, IMPROVES OUTCOMES

Patients may seek help for and find safety from IPV in stages or steps, and it may take them several months or even years to do so.61–63 In this sense, then, IPV is an issue that is not likely to be “cured” or changed in a single medical visit. In addition, a single visit may not be associated with direct health and safety outcomes. However, a patient is more likely to make changes if she has supportive and informative interaction with a caring, nonjudgmental clinician who can increase her awareness of IPV and IPV resources and promote an improved sense of self-efficacy or perceived power.40

For example, in a study in which health clinicians expressed concern about potential IPV health effects and offered support services such as counseling, 67% of women used one of those resources at least once.40 In another study, women who talked to a health care provider about their abuse were almost four times more likely to use an IPV intervention (eg, advocacy, shelter, restraining order) than women who did not talk to their provider. Those who used an IPV intervention were 2.6 times more likely to leave their abusive relationship, and those who left reported improved physical health.64

Thus, health care providers can have a positive effect by addressing this complex and difficult issue. The power and influence of a provider’s kindness, empathy, and support cannot be overestimated in their ability to improve the safety and well-being of women dealing with IPV.