ADVERTISEMENT

Eosinophilic esophagitis: An increasingly recognized cause of dysphagia, food impaction, and refractory heartburn

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2008 September;75(9):623-626, 629-633
Author and Disclosure Information

ABSTRACTEosinophilic esophagitis is an increasingly recognized cause of a variety of esophageal symptoms, including dysphagia, food impaction, atypical chest pain, and heartburn that does not respond to medical therapy. Its cause is unknown, but allergic and immunemediated mechanisms similar to those of asthma and other atopic diseases are implicated.

KEY POINTS

  • The diagnosis is made with upper endoscopy and esophageal biopsies that show diffuse infiltration of eosinophils.
  • Current treatment in adults is limited and consists of either swallowed fluticasone (Flonase) or a proton pump inhibitor.
  • Because many patients with eosinophilic esophagitis have atopic disease, a complete evaluation for dietary allergens and aeroallergens is recommended, as avoidance of these allergens may be helpful in some adults.
  • Cautious endoscopic dilation is a treatment option in patients with evidence of esophageal stenosis. Systemic corticosteroids and novel biologic therapy have been used in refractory cases.

THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ALLERGENS AND GENETICS

Studies in children suggest that food allergies are a major contributor to eosinophilic esophagitis. In children, a strict amino-acid elemental diet has led to complete resolution of symptoms and a marked decrease in esophageal eosinophils. However, symptoms tend to recur once patients resume a regular diet.12

It is unclear if dietary modification is effective in adults. In six adults with eosinophilic esophagitis and a history of wheat and rye allergies, symptoms did not improve when these foods were eliminated and did not worsen when they were reintroduced.13

Of interest, there may be a seasonal variation of eosinophilic esophagitis, as suggested by a case report of a 21-year-old woman who had eosinophilic esophagitis that worsened symptomatically and histologically during the pollen season but resolved during winter. This is another example of the role aeroallergens may play in this disease.14

Evidence of a genetic predisposition to this disease is also growing, with a number of case reports describing multiple affected family members spanning generations.15

NEW CONSENSUS ON DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA

The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is made histologically, with “marked” eosinophilia on esophageal biopsies, ie, usually 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field. In contrast, a normal esophagus contains almost no eosinophils,16 and esophageal biopsies of patients with GERD usually have fewer than 10 eosinophils per high-power field, with eosinophils limited to the distal esophagus.17

However, a recent systematic review of the literature found 10 different histologic definitions of eosinophilic esophagitis, ranging from more than 5 to more than 30 eosinophils, and more than one-third of the articles included in the review did not contain any specific diagnostic criteria. Similarly, a lack of consensus on the size of a high-power field (ranging from 0.12 to 0.44 mm2) resulted in a 23-fold variability in the description of eosinophil density. Moreover, the biopsy protocols were reported in only 39% of the articles.18

In view of the growing interest in this disease, its increasing recognition, the diagnostic ambiguity described above, and concern about the role of acid reflux, consensus recommendations for its diagnosis and treatment in adults and children have recently been published.19 The current consensus definition for eosinophilic esophagitis is:

  • Clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction (eg, dysphagia, food impaction);
  • At least 15 eosinophils per high-power field; and
  • Either no response to a high-dose proton pump inhibitor or normal results on pH monitoring of the distal esophagus.

Figure 2. Top, esophageal biopsy with changes of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Characteristic findings include squamous hyperplasia wherein the basal cell layer accounts for greater than 15% of the mucosal thickness; the subepithelial papillae reach greater than two-thirds of the mucosal thickness; and a variety of inflammatory cells may be present including eosinophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophils. (Hematoxylin and eosin, × 100). Bottom, esophageal biopsy from a patient with eosinophilic esophagitis showing numerous intraepithelial eosinophils (> 15 per high-power field) and superficial eosinophilic microabscesses (arrows). Squamous hyperplasia is seen as well, withelongation of the subepithelial papillae and an expanded basal cell layer. (Hematoxylin and eosin, × 400).
Other features such as basal zone hyperplasia, edema, and papillary elongation are seen to a greater extent in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis than in patients with GERD (Figure 2).20

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Eosinophilic esophagitis predominantly affects men between the ages of 20 and 40, but cases in women and in younger and older patients have also been reported. Recent systematic reviews found a male-to-female ratio of approximately 3:1.

More than 90% of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis present with intermittent difficulty swallowing solids, while food impaction occurs in more than 60%. Heartburn is the only manifestation in 24% of patients. Noncardiac chest pain, vomiting, and abdominal pain have also been seen, but less frequently.

Up to 80% of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis have a history of atopic disease such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, or allergies to food or medicine. One-third to one-half of patients have peripheral eosinophilia, and up to 55% have increased serum levels of immunoglobulin E (IgE).21

In children, presenting symptoms vary with age and include feeding disorders, vomiting, abdominal pain, and dysphagia. Moreover, children with eosinophilic esophagitis have a higher frequency of atopic symptoms and peripheral eosinophilia than do adults.5,22

Courtesy of Edgar Achkar, MD
Figure 3. Endoscopic appearance of the middle esophagus of a 36-year-old man with eosinophilic esophagitis. Note the multiple concentric rings resembling the trachea. Linear furrows (white arrows) are also a common finding. The small white papule (black arrows) proved on histologic study to be an eosinophilic microabscess.
Although no single endoscopic feature of eosinophilic esophagitis is pathognomonic, the esophagus shows mucosal fragility in 59% of cases, a corrugated or ringed appearance in 49%, strictures in 40%, whitish papules in 16%, and a narrow caliber in 5% (Figure 3).21 Many of these features, including longitudinal furrows, are subtle and can be missed. Between 9% and 32% of patients with symptoms suggesting eosinophilic esophagitis have normal endoscopic findings.

Although motor abnormalities are common in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (up to 40% of patients have esophageal manometric abnormalities, including uncoordinated contractions and ineffective peristalsis),21 esophageal manometry is of limited diagnostic value and so is not recommended as a routine test.19

Courtesy of Edgar Achkar, MD
Figure 4. Barium esophagram of a 23-year-old man with eosinophilic esophagitis. The arrows in the middle esophagus show focal narrowing and subtle concentric rings, referred to as trachealization.
Radiographically, eosinophilic esophagitis can appear as a series of concentric rings on barium study—hence the term “ringed esophagus” (Figure 4). In a study of 14 patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, 10 (70%) had strictures of various length with rings within the strictures.23

These findings support the theory that inflammation can lead to submucosal fibrosis, remodeling, narrowing, and eventually symptoms. Furthermore, two recent studies found that children with eosinophilic esophagitis had increased subepithelial collagen deposition in their biopsy specimens,24 suggesting increased potential for fibrosis. Also increased are transforming growth factor beta (a profibrotic cytokine) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, which is implicated in angiogenesis.25

Although many patients with eosinophilic esophagitis have abnormal findings on barium radiography, the test is most useful before esophagogastroduodenoscopy to determine whether a stricture is present and potentially to guide endoscopic dilation.19