ADVERTISEMENT

Diabetic retinopathy: The FP’s role in preserving vision

The Journal of Family Practice. 2020 April;69(3):120-126 | 10.1038/nphys1170
Author and Disclosure Information

Evaluation and Tx of this debilitating complication falls to the eye specialist, but you play a central role in assessing risk and optimizing prevention strategies.

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

› Refer patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) to an ophthalmologist or ­optometrist for a ­dilated and comprehensive eye ­examination within 5 years of disease onset. B

› Refer patients with type 2 DM to an ­ophthalmologist or optometrist for an initial dilated and ­comprehensive eye examination at time of diagnosis. B

› Control blood ­pressure—ideally, < 140/90 mm Hg—in patients with DM to reduce the risk of ­diabetic retinopathy. A

Strength of recommendation (SOR)

A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series

Time since diagnosis. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy found that the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy varied from 28.8% in people who had DM for < 5 years to 77.8% in people who had DM for ≥ 15 years. The rate of proliferative diabetic retinopathy was 2% in people who had DM for < 5 years and 15.5% in those who had DM for ≥ 15 years.11

Diabetic retinopathy can deteriorate during pregnancy but generally reverts to the pre-pregnancy level; long-term progression of retinopathy is not affected.

Demographic variables. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy is higher in men, non-Hispanic blacks (38.8%), and ­people with type 1 DM.4,5,11-13 The Veterans ­Affairs Diabetes Trial found a higher prevalence of moderate-to-severe diabetic retinopathy in Hispanics (36%) and African Americans (29%) than in non-Hispanic whites (22%).14

Among people with DM who have ­diabetic retinopathy, systolic and diastolic BP and the HbA1C level tend to be higher. They are more likely to use insulin to control disease.4,5,13 In a recent cross-sectional analysis, the prevalence of vision-threatening retinopathy was higher among people ≥ 65 years of age (1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-1.5%) than among people 40 to 64 years of age (0.4%; 95% CI, 0.3%-0.7%) (P = .009).5

Does pregnancy exacerbate retinopathy? Controversy surrounds the role of pregnancy in the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial found a short-term increase in the level of retinopathy during pregnancy that persisted into the first postpartum year. A 1.63-fold greater risk of any deterioration of retinopathy was observed in women who received intensive DM treatment from before to during pregnancy (P < .05); pregnant women who received conventional treatment had a 2.48-fold greater risk than nonpregnant women with DM who received conventional treatment (P < .001).

Deterioration of retinopathy during pregnancy had no long-term consequences, however, regardless of type of treatment.15 More importantly, in most cases, changes in the level of retinopathy revert to the pre-­pregnancy level after 1 year or longer, and pregnancy does not appear to affect long-term progression of retinopathy.15

Continue to: Proven primary prevention strategies