Differences in psychosocial stressors between black and white cancer patients
Background Screening patients with cancer for psychosocial distress enables providers to make referrals to resources early in the course of treatment. There is some evidence of differential impact of cancer on mental health between racial/ethnic groups, but the results are not consistent.
Objectives To examine differences in overall distress and individual psychosocial stressors between black and white cancer patients at first visit to the cancer center.
Methods This study included all invasive cancer patients from an urban, academic cancer center in the Midwest who completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer from January 1, 2015 to February 19, 2016. Comparisons were made on overall distress score and for each individual stressor in the instrument. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to predict high distress by race adjusting for sex, age, and cancer type.
Results A total of 933 patients with invasive cancer completed the NCCN distress screening tool. The full sample was 16.9% black, and 32.6% of the sample indicated high distress on their first visit. There was no difference in overall distress score between black and white patients. Black patients more frequently identified housing, ability to have children, and loss of interest as sources of distress, whereas white patients more often identified treatment decisions and nervousness.
Limitations Limitations include limited capacity to explore demographic differences in our sample; some patients did not receive the distress screening tool thus some cancer sites are proportionally more represented in the sample.
Conclusions The findings do not indicate overall distress differences between black and white patients, but they do indicate differences in the source of distress, possibly indicating different resource needs or intervention strategies between black and white cancer patients.
Accepted for publication July 14, 2017
Correspondence Leslie Hinyard, PhD, MSW; hinyardl@slu.edu
Disclosures The authors report no disclosures/conflicts of interest.
Citation JCSO 2017;15(6):e314-e320
©2017 Frontline Medical Communications
doi https://doi.org/10.12788/jcso.0366
Related articles
The effect of centralizing breast cancer care in an urban public hospital
Comprehensive assessment of cancer survivors’ concerns to inform program development
Submit a paper here
For patients with cancer, acknowledgment of mental and emotional distress is critically important when developing and implementing a treatment plan. The psychosocial distress associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment can have an impact on a patient’s quality of life, influence a patient’s ability to adhere to treatment regimens, and increase cost of care.1-4 Rates of depression have been reported to range from 8%-36%, with a 29% risk of anxiety in cancer patients.5, 6 Emotional distress is linked to increased hopelessness about their cancer diagnosis, increased issues with chronic pain, and negative treatment outcomes.7 Timely screening of psychosocial distress at the first clinical visit enables providers to make appropriate referrals to resources early in their course of treatment; however, referrals to psychosocial interventions remain infrequent nationwide in the United States.8
There is some evidence of a differential impact of cancer on mental health diagnoses between racial/ethnic groups; however, results are not entirely consistent across studies. Using the Kessler Pyschological Distress Scale (K6) score, Alcala and colleagues found that cancer was more detrimental to mental health for black patients than for non-Hispanic white patients.9 Black breast cancer survivors have also been shown to be more likely to stop working during the early phases of their treatment, indicating that they and their physicians need to take steps to minimize long-term employment consequences.10 However, in a study of women with breast cancer, black women reported fewer depressive symptoms than did non-Hispanic whites.11
The American College of Surgeons’ Commission on Cancer (ACS CoC) developed a set of Continuum of Care standards in 2012, including the implementation of psychosocial distress screening for patients with cancer. Since 2015, all accredited cancer programs are now required to evaluate these patients for signs of distress during at least 1 pivotal physician visit.12 The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology has developed a tool that provides a mechanism for meeting the requirements of the ACS CoC accreditation requirements. The NCCN defines distress in cancer as “a multifactorial unpleasant emotional experience of a psychological (cognitive, behavioral, emotional), social, and/or spiritual nature that may interfere with the ability to cope effectively with cancer, its physical symptoms and its treatment.”13 The recommendation of the NCCN is to provide a brief screening for psychosocial distress to identify individuals in need of additional support and to provide referrals for patients at high risk of psychosocial distress. The NCCN Distress Thermometer screening tool has been widely accepted as an effective method of identifying and characterizing distress. The NCCN tool provides a visual analogue scale for patients to rate their current distress on a scale of 1-10, as well as a problem checklist. The problem checklist includes 22 stressors addressing the practical, spiritual/religious, emotional, and physical concerns of patients. Although the NCCN tool is used widely, differences in distress scores between black and white cancer patients have not been previously described. The purpose of the study was to compare the global distress screening scores of black and white patients at an academic comprehensive cancer center in the Midwest. A second objective was to examine the distribution of individual stressors between black and white women.
Methods
Study sample
The study included all cancer patients from a cancer center in the Midwest who completed the NCCN distress thermometer during January 1, 2015-February 19, 2016. The patient population for this cancer center was primarily non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black, therefore, only patients identifying as non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black are included in this analysis. As part of routine clinical care, patients are asked to complete the NCCN distress thermometer at their first visit to the center. All patients in this analytic sample were newly diagnosed patients. Some patients also completed the NCCN screening tool at additional appointments; therefore, for patients with more than 1 completed tool, only the first distress screening was used in this analysis. Overall scores and individual stressor scores were entered into the electronic medical record by clinic staff at the time the patients were roomed for their visit. Patient demographics were collected through a reporting mechanism within the electronic medical record that allows for monitoring of the psychosocial screening process.
Variables
Race was assessed through self-report and classified as non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black. There were not enough patients of any other racial/ethnic group to be included in this analysis. Age was categorized as 18-40 years, 41-60 years, 61-84 years, and 85 years and older. Cancer type was grouped as follows: head and neck cancer, gastrointestinal cancer (esophagus, stomach, small intestine, colon, rectum, anus), hepatobiliary (liver, gallbladder, pancreas), sarcoma (bone and soft tissue), melanoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, breast cancer, genitourinary (prostate, kidney, bladder), hematologic, and brain.