of the two investigational agents.
The study by William J. Sandborn, MD, division of gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, and colleagues wasin Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Ritlecitinib is a dual inhibitor that selectively inhibits Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) and the TEC family of tyrosine kinases, while brepocitinib is a dual tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) and JAK1 inhibitor.
Both agents have demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in the treatment of alopecia areata andand are being evaluated for treating vitiligo, , and UC.
The different JAK selectivity profiles of ritlecitinib (JAK3/TEC) and brepocitinib (TYK2/JAK1), compared with other JAK inhibitors, could further the understanding of the role these pathways play in UC, the investigators note.
The VIBRATO study
As part of the, 317 patients with moderate to severe active UC (total Mayo Score ≥ 6) were randomly assigned to an 8-week induction course of once-daily oral ritlecitinib (20, 70, or 200 mg), brepocitinib (10, 30, or 60 mg), or matching placebo.
At week 8, compared with placebo, treatment with ritlecitinib or brepocitinib was associated with significantly lower mean total Mayo Scores (the primary endpoint) and higher rates of clinical remission, endoscopic and histologic improvement, and mucosal healing.
For both drugs, improvement on most metrics was dose dependent, with greater benefit at the highest dose.
For example, the placebo-adjusted mean total Mayo Score at week 8 was −4.6 for ritlecitinib 200 mg (P < .001) and −3.2 for brepocitinib 60 mg (P < .001). Both agents showed a “rapid” onset of action, with significant effects on the partial Mayo Score seen after just 2 weeks of treatment, the authors report.
Modified clinical remission at week 8 (a key secondary endpoint) was achieved in 36% of patients taking ritlecitinib 200 mg and 25.5% of those taking brepocitinib 60 mg (vs. 0% for patients taking placebo).
Endoscopic and histologic improvement, clinical response, mucosal healing, and the patient-reported outcome on the
Longer-term data needed
Both agents were well tolerated with “acceptable short-term safety profiles,” the authors say.
There were no clinically significant findings for any laboratory parameters evaluated. Adverse events were mostly mild.
Infections were observed in 8.7% of patients taking ritlecitinib and 16.9% of those taking brepocitinib, compared with 4% of patients taking placebo. No serious cases ofoccurred.
One patient taking ritlecitinib sufferedand died, and one patient taking brepocitinib had peripheral artery thrombosis (left tibial artery). Both cases were considered unrelated to the study drug.
“As JAK inhibitors are associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolisms, larger studies are needed for ritlecitinib and brepocitinib to fully understand their safety profiles,” the investigators say.
Limitations of the study include the small sample size and short 8-week treatment period. Longer-term safety and efficacy of both agents are being investigated.
The study was sponsored by Pfizer, which is developing both drugs. Dr. Sandborn and several coauthors have disclosed financial relationships with the company.
A version of this article first appeared on.