Facial Involvement in Progressive Macular Hypomelanosis

Comment

The 4 cases of PMH reported here showed extensive facial involvement in addition to the characteristic hypopigmented lesions on the trunk, arms, and legs. It is unclear why the lesions in these patients had a predominantly facial distribution. Involvement of the face in PMH has not been commonly reported in the literature. Martínez-Martínez et al³ reported 12 PMH patients with lesions only presenting in lumbar and abdominal distributions. Kim et al⁸ presented a series of 23 PMH patients treated with narrowband UVB in whom 56% (9/16) saw repigmentation in 90% of the lesions following treatment. The most commonly affected area was the lower back, followed by the abdomen, upper back, chest, sacral region, flank, and shoulders, respectively.⁸ In a review by Relyveld et al,¹ PMH is described as a predominantly truncal disease that can occasionally extend to the neck, face, and proximal arms and legs; however, no specific cases were reported.

Previous case series have reported PMH primarily in adolescents and young adults, with mean ages ranging from 26 to 30 years.^1,3 The 4 patients reported here were older, ranging in age from 40 to 65 years. This discrepancy in age may contribute to the facial distribution encountered in this patient population; however, given the small number of patients in our case series, such extrapolation is premature. Most recently, Westerhof et al⁶ demonstrated a relationship between the presence of P acnes, a common skin commensal of the face, and the hypopigmented macules of PMH. The investigators suggested that some strains of P acnes produce a factor that is yet to be identified that interferes with melanogenesis. The response of PMH lesions to topical treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, and phototherapy has lent credence to the potential etiologic role of P acnes in this condition.^9,10 The interplay between age, PMH distribution, and P acnes requires further investigation.

The biopsies in our 4 patients were consistent with the nonspecific histopathologic characteristics of PMH lesions. Biopsies in all 4 patients revealed a sparse perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, and in 2 of the cases, postinflammatory pigmentary alteration was noted. Such changes often are described in PMH lesions.^4,5 In other cases detailed in the literature, lesional and nonlesional skin often are indistinguishable on hematoxylin and eosin staining.¹¹ In the 3 patients for whom we performed additional immunohistochemical studies, results were mixed: Melan-A staining revealed a decreased number of melanocytes in Patient 1 but not in Patients 2 or 4. Many reported cases in the literature have not demonstrated a decrease in melanocyte density but instead show a decrease in melanin content in lesional skin.^1-3,6,7 Although additional stains performed in Patient 4 revealed neither a decrease in the number of melanocytes nor a decrease in the melanin content, such histopathologic findings of PMH often are subtle. Additional stains were not performed in Patient 3. More studies are needed to characterize the immunohistochemical staining patterns of lesional skin in patients with PMH.

Tinea versicolor, pityriasis alba, mycosis fungoides, sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis typically are included in the differential diagnosis for PMH. Tinea versicolor traditionally is diagnosed based on the combination of irregular hypopigmented or hyperpigmented scaly macules and a KOH preparation that is positive for hyphae and spores. Similar to PMH, tinea versicolor is most often found on the trunk, but unusual cases have been reported involving the face.¹²

Patient 2 reflected how it can be difficult diagnostically to distinguish between tinea versicolor and PMH. Although this patient initially had a KOH scraping suggestive for tinea versicolor, adequate treatment with oral fluconazole and ketoconazole shampoo did not result in improvement. The hypopigmented lesions in this patient continued to progress despite therapy. Additionally, his hypopigmented to depigmented nonscaly macules were more clinically consistent with the characteristic description of lesion configuration in PMH than with the irregular, more sharply defined, asymmetric, and scaly spots of tinea versicolor. Furthermore, the inflammatory findings on biopsy favored a diagnosis of PMH.

Pityriasis alba, most frequently presents on the face in the form of hypopigmented, sometimes slightly scaly macules but also can occur on the body. It usually occurs in younger patients who often have an atopic diathesis. Histologic findings generally are nonspecific, but discrete eczematous changes can sometimes be appreciated in the epidermis and dermis. None of our patients had histories suggestive of an atopic diathesis or lesion distributions typical of pityriasis alba. Histologic findings also were more consistent with PMH than pityriasis alba.

A diagnosis of patch-stage hypopigmented MF should also be entertained in patients with hypopigmented macules, as it can appear similar to the lesions of PMH. Hypopigmented MF often is associated with subtle atrophy, scaling, poikiloderma, and erythema. These features were not present in the 4 cases presented here. Histologically, atypical lymphocytes with prominent epidermotropism and tagging of the epidermis by large lymphocytic infiltrates are seen in cases of hypopigmented MF. These findings were not present in biopsies from our patients.

Hypopigmented sarcoidosis, leprosy, and syphilis are other systemic diseases associated with hypopigmented lesions. Histologically, noncaseasting granulomas in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue would favor a diagnosis of sarcoidosis over PMH. In patients who live in endemic areas, a diagnosis of leprosy for an anesthetic hypopigmented lesion would be higher in the differential. Finally, it is important to rule out secondary syphilis when diagnosing PMH. Known as the great imitator, secondary syphilis may present in a patient in the form of hypopigmented macules. Patients 1, 2, and 4 had nonreactive RPR tests; unfortunately, RPR was not checked in Patient 3. He denied all risk factors for syphilis.

Various topical and oral treatments were prescribed for each patient, but so far none have been unequivocally effective. In the literature, there are reports supporting the efficacy of topical antimicrobial agents targeting P acnes.^9,10 One case report noted improvement in a patient with PMH after isotretinoin use.¹³ Phototherapy also has been reported to improve PMH in several case reports^4-8; however, consistent response to these therapies has not been documented. Unfortunately for patients with a diagnosis of PMH, a lack of effective treatment options often exists.

This series of 4 cases highlights the importance of considering PMH in the differential of hypopigmented macules, even when they appear predominantly on the face.