ADVERTISEMENT

Med Students’ Simple Idea Has Serious Potential

The Hospitalist. 2011 June;2011(06):

The interactive toolkit allows users to submit their own suggestions for improved processes and features introductions to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) “meaningful use” standard. Gallagher is hopeful that an engaged physician response to the toolkit will only bolster its efficacy in the coming months. “This is going to continue to evolve,” she says.—RQ

QUALITY RESEARCH

Care Transitions, Readmissions Concern Other Countries

International studies suggest that the recent torrent of attention toward improving care transitions and preventing hospital readmissions is not just an American trend. For example, a literature survey of physician “handovers” (aka handoffs) in international hospitals published in the British Medical Journal for Quality and Safety identified 32 papers on the subject.1 The authors conclude that the existing literature rarely examines pre- and post-handover phases or evaluates the quality of handover practices, and thus “does not fully identify where communication failures typically occur.” More systematic analysis of all stages of handoffs by physicians is warranted, the authors suggest.

In the same journal, a literature search of English-language publications from 1990 to 2010 found a dozen studies—eight from the U.S.—documenting failure to perform adequate follow-up for patients’ test results.2 The lack of follow-up ranged from 20% to 62% for hospitalized patients, and from 1% to 75% for patients treated in the ED. Two areas where problems were particularly evident were critical test results and results for patients moving across healthcare settings. “The existing evidence suggests that the problem of missed test results is considerable and reported negative impacts on patients warrant the exploration of solutions,” the authors conclude. They recommend further study of the effectiveness of such interventions as online endorsement of results, and integration of information technology into clinical work practices.

The World Alliance for Patient Safety, which was convened in 2004 by the World Health Organization, recently pointed to poor test result follow-up as one of the major processes contributing to unsafe patient care internationally.1 The organization has identified nine “patient-safety solutions,” one of which is ensuring medication accuracy at transitions of care.

For more information on the alliance and WHO’s interest in patient safety, visit https://www.who.int/topics/patient_safety/en/. —LB

References

  1. Raduma-Tomás MA, Flin R, Yule S, Williams D. Doctors’ handovers in hospi- tals: a literature review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:128-133.
  2. Callen J, Georgiou A, Li J, Westbrook JI. The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:194-199.

BY THE NUMBERS

90%

The proportion of adverse events in U.S. hospitals that are missed by the two most common methods of detecting them: 1) voluntary reporting and 2) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient safety indicators.

Authors of a study published in Health Affairs documented 10 times as many identifiable adverse events at three large U.S. hospitals with well-funded safety programs when using two screens and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s “Global Trigger” tool, compared with reports using only the commonly used tools.1

The proportion of hospital stays that result in medical errors, extrapolated from chart reviews, was 33.2%.—LB

Reference

  1. Classen DC, Resar R, et al. “Global Trigger Tool” shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Affairs. 2011;30:581-589