Attention to Detail
The Hospitalist. 2010 April;2010(04):
April 1, 2010 | The Hospitalist
- Documentation for transbronchial biopsy (a surgical DRG) in which the medical record only shows pathology of bronchus tissue (which RACs regard as nonsurgical);
- Failure to document the severity of a patient’s anemia as such to meet the medical necessity requirement of a blood transfusion (e.g., a chronic blood loss anemia or a pernicious anemia); and
- Documentation of treatments performed by intensivists in an ICU. By the time a patient’s attending physician sees their patient out of the ICU, DeVault says, their acute renal failure could be turned around but the attending might not document what happened in the ICU. The intensivist must see to it that the documentation allows the appropriate DRG assignment for the level of care the patient received.
AHIMA has published a 65-page RAC Audit Toolkit that describes the audit process, outlines preparations and procedures, and offers concrete guidance for appeals. Download a copy at www.ahima.org/infocenter/documents/RACToolkitFINAL.pdf. TH
Chris Guadagnino is a freelance medical writer based in Philadelphia.
Reference
- The Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program: an evaluation of the 3-year demonstration. CMS Web site. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC/Downloads/RACEvaluationReport.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2010.
Refinements in CMS’ Permanent RAC Program
Connie Leonard
Based on lessons learned from demonstration programs, CMS has made a number of changes to the permanent Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program.
Among the changes are:
- RACs cannot audit claims earlier than three years from the start of the program, with a maximum look-back date of October 1, 2007;
- For physicians, RACs are limited to requesting 10 medical records per 45 days from a single physician, 20 medical records from a small practice of two to five physicians, 30 from a group of six to 15, and 50 from a large group of more than 16 physicians;
- For hospitals, RACs are limited to requesting 1% of all claims submitted for the previous calendar year, divided into eight periods (45 days). Although the RACs may go more than 45 days between record requests, in no case shall they make requests more frequently than every 45 days;
- RACs must send a “Detailed Review Results” letter within 60 calendar days of receipt of the medical records they request for review;
- Each RAC must hire a physician medical director and certified coders, and providers may request the credentials of their auditor and request to speak to their RAC’s medical director regarding a claim denial;
- All new issues that an RAC wishes to pursue for overpayments must be validated by CMS or an independent RAC validation contractor, and posted to the RAC’s Web site before widespread review;
- RACS must have a Web-based “Claim Status” platform that will allow providers to track the status of medical record submissions to RACs;
- RACs must pay back contingency fees when an improper payment determination is overturned at any level in the appeals process (demo RACs were allowed to retain them on determinations overturned on second- and third-level appeal); and
- RAC validation contractors will conduct a third-party review of RAC claims determinations and provide annual accuracy scores for each RAC.—CG
