Commentary

Education: The Mediating Factor in Gun Violence?

Of the many responses to Marie-Eileen Onieal’s editorial on gun violence (2018;28[5]:7-8), two focused on perceived societal causes.


 

I read “Up In Arms About Gun Violence” in the May/June issue of Clinician Reviews with great interest. My response is drawn from research, professional experience, and three particularly formative experiences:

  • The birth of a child with learning and behavioral differences requiring an individualized education program and temporary placement in an alternative school.
  • Co-leading a parent workshop for my clinical Capstone project.
  • A nonclinical position at a public alternative school for children with emotional and behavioral disorders.

In nursing, as in all human services, we strive to be holistic, drawing from science, research, ethics, human development, sociology, anthropology, etc, to function in our roles. Many in nursing have come to value and function well in multidisciplinary teams for the management of individuals with complex needs.

What I have learned in my life—a fact supported by my professional preparation—is that the cycle of poverty, poor health, and quality of life are greatly influenced by education. During my pediatrics rotation and clinical, I learned you must consider family to be the vehicle by which the child may benefit from your clinical services. Therefore, you must reach beyond your setting in an effective and consistent way to engage, connect the home, and then follow up for response. My colleagues are aware of the need to document and the processes currently available for health, social service, and school professionals to report concerns. Too often, obstacles and other influences stand in the way of our ethical duty as professionals; we must find a way to overcome them, both individually and as a group.

We have processes for adolescents aging out of foster care and the developmentally delayed transitioning to sheltered work; can these be expanded?

My experience in a public school district’s alternative school for children in grades 6-12 opened my eyes to the need for the public to understand how these schools function. I likened these schools to the intensive care unit in the acute care setting. Smaller population, high needs, high cost, and dedicated staff but high burnout and turnover. Children in my school came from foster care or struggling homes and often had experienced trauma. Underfunded school districts cut nurses and social workers, cannot attract professional support staff, and choose to distribute money and efforts on the general population in neighborhood schools.

My “professional health care” mindset was embedded in an environment of wounded children, amazing educators, and support staff; powerless to do our best, we held on. But it is not enough to just hold on, sequestering at-risk children out of sight. We can do better.

Continue to: Some ideas to turn this belief into reality

Next Article:

   Comments ()