Article

Bone sarcomas: Overview of management, with a focus on surgical treatment considerations

Author and Disclosure Information

ABSTRACT

Outcomes for patients with bone sarcomas have improved dramatically over the past 40 years, and most bone sarcomas today are treated with surgery and chemotherapy. The most common clinical findings in patients with bone sarcomas are pain and an enlarging bone mass, although pain is not generally a good indicator of malignancy. In general, any patient with a bone mass with indeterminate imaging findings should be referred to an orthopedic oncologist. Bone sarcomas are diagnosed after a biopsy, which is best performed by the surgeon who will be doing the curative resection. Postresection reconstruction of the affected limb is generally done with an allograft-prosthetic composite or a modular metallic prosthetic joint replacement device. Post-­therapy follow-up at frequent and regular intervals is critical to assess for recurrence and lung metastasis.


 

References

Prior to the 1970s, bone sarcomas were routinely treated with amputation, yet most patients still died from metastatic disease. 1 The advent of the use of chemotherapy for bone sarcomas in the 1970s was shown to increase long-term survival, 2–5 contributing in part to tremendous subsequent advances in the treatment of the most common bone sarcomas—osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Today, long-term disease-free survival rates of about 60% to 80% are observed for patients with Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma with no metastasis at presentation. 6,7 In addition to the chemotherapy advances, modular metallic prosthetic limb reconstruction systems are now readily available, eliminating the need to wait for custom reconstructive hardware. Moreover, these systems can be used in combination with large bone allografts or vascularized bone flaps.

The majority of patients with bone sarcomas require multimodal treatment, primarily with surgery and chemotherapy. Patients with chondrosarcomas are the primary exception, as chondrosarcomas are generally treated with resection alone. Thus, management of most patients with bone sarcomas requires a multidisciplinary team that includes orthopedic, medical, and radiation oncologists as well as plastic and reconstructive surgeons, physical therapy specialists, pathologists, and radiologists with expertise in bone tumors.

Despite this broad need for multimodal therapy, surgical resection is fundamental to the management of virtually all bone sarcomas and is the primary focus of this article. The roles of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for bone sarcomas are detailed in the final two articles in this supplement.

INITIAL EVALUATION OF SUSPICIOUS BONE MASSES

Figure 1. A general step-by-step approach to the patient with a bone abnormality on radiography. *If widespread metastatic disease is found, then resection is not indicated for curative purposes but still can be useful for palliation.

Figure 1 outlines a general stepwise approach to the evaluation and management of the patient with a bone mass suspicious for sarcoma—an approach detailed in the section below.

History and physical examination

As noted in the preceding article in this supplement, most bone sarcomas (particularly osteosarcomas and Ewing sarcomas) occur in pediatric patients and young adults and develop in the extremities (especially the distal femur) or pelvis.

In terms of history, most patients with a bone sarcoma will report pain, but pain is not a good indicator of malignancy, as some patients with no pain or an improvement in pain have sarcomas while many patients with pain do not have malignancies. 1

The other most common finding in patients with a bone sarcoma is an enlarging mass. The presence of a mass, as well as its location, depth, size, and overlying skin quality, can be determined on physical examination. An accurate neurovascular exam should be performed as well, although damage to neurovascular structures is a late finding in sarcoma patients.

Imaging

Radiographs are important in any patient with prolonged unexplained bone pain and will almost always reveal an aggressive lesion in the patient with a bone sarcoma. Lengthy delays in the diagnosis of a bone sarcoma are nearly always explained by failure to obtain a radiograph.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Questions about whether a radiograph of a lesion is determinate or not are best resolved by MRI, which is the primary imaging method for evaluating bone lesions, their exact location, and their proximity to neurovascular structures. While “determinate” and “indeterminate” are most precisely used to refer to imaging studies of a lesion, these terms are often used in clinical parlance to refer to the lesions themselves. As such, “determinate lesions” by imaging are those that can be accurately judged malignant or benign with a high level of certainty. Determinate benign inactive lesions such as enchondromas and osteochondromas, if asymptomatic and without severe bony destruction, do not require a bone biopsy. “Indeterminate lesions” by imaging are those whose imaging findings are not clearly consistent with a single diagnosis, and nearly all of these lesions require a biopsy.

Pages

Next Article:

Related Articles