BERLIN – Albiglutide, a glucagonlike peptide–1 (GLP-1) agonist, added on top of the standard of care reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with established cardiovascular disease by a significant 22% versus placebo in the HARMONY Outcomes trial, according to results reported at the annual meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.
The trial’s findings, which were published simultaneously in, have added “further support that evidence-based GLP-1 receptor agonists should be part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk for cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes as recommended by recent cardiology and diabetes guidelines,” said study investigator .
Albiglutide was approved for the treatment of T2DM by the European Medicines Agency asand by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States as in 2014. Last year, however, its manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, announced that it would cease further research and development, manufacturing, and sales activity for albiglutide. Nevertheless, the company remained committed to completing the HARMONY Outcomes trial, begun in 2015.
In aissued by GSK on Oct. 2, 2018, the same day as the trial’s findings were revealed, John Lepore, MD, the senior vice president of GSK’s R&D pipeline said, “HARMONY Outcomes was an important study for us to complete to generate new data and insights about the role of the GLP-1 receptor agonist class in the management of patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease.”
Dr. Lepore added, “GSK continued to invest in this study… and we continue to explore opportunities to divest this medicine to a company with the right expertise and resources to realize its full potential for patients.”
During his summing up of the HARMONY Outcomes data, Dr. Leiter of the University of Toronto observed that all components of the composite primary endpoint – which included MI, cardiovascular death, and stroke – were “directionally consistent with overall benefit.” However, it was the 25% reduction in MI that drove the overall benefit seen.
With an average duration of follow-up of just 1.6 years, it was no wonder perhaps that no effect on a long-term outcome such as cardiovascular death was seen, Dr. Leiter suggested. Insufficient trial length was a fact picked up by the independent commentator for the trial, professor of diabetic medicine at the University of Oxford (England).
“HARMONY recruited patients who were extremely near the edge of a cliff,” Dr. Matthews observed, noting that, if a trial was to be completed in such a short span of time, a very-high-risk population needed to be recruited.
Indeed, 100% of the study population in the trial had cardiovascular disease; specifically, 70% had coronary artery disease, 47% had a prior MI, 43% had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention, and 25% had peripheral arterial disease. In addition, 86% had hypertension, 20% had heart failure, and 18% had experienced a stroke. Furthermore, the average hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at baseline was 8.7%.
When you are thinking about trial design, you want to recruit patients who are near the edge so that you see lots of events, but not too near such that treatment makes no difference and not too far from the edge or the trial will go on and on, Dr. Matthews observed.
With regards to the primary composite endpoint, he noted that no adjustment of the significance level was needed to test the superiority of albiglutide over placebo. The hazard ratio was 0.78, with a P value of less than .0001 for noninferiority and P = .0006 for superiority, and event rates per 100 patient-years were 4.57 for albiglutide and 5.87 for placebo.
The mean change in HbA1c over time was greater with albiglutide than with placebo, with a between-group difference of –0.63% at 8 months and –0.52% at 16 months. These data suggest that albiglutide seems to have weaker effects than semaglutide, Dr. Matthews noted.
“The odd thing about albiglutide was the weight didn’t change,” Dr. Matthews observed when discussing some of the secondary endpoints. The difference in body weight between albiglutide and placebo was –0.66 kg at 8 months and –0.83 kg at 16 months.
If the results on body mass index with another GLP-1 agonist, semaglutide, were considered, effects on body weight in the HARMONY Outcomes trial were negligible, Dr. Matthews added. This point was something Twitter users also commented on.
“The weight loss is really modest with albiglutide in HARMONY”, said, an National Institute for Health Research clinician scientist at the University of Birmingham (U.K.) and an honorary consultant endocrinologist the Heart of England National Health Service Foundation Trust in Birmingham.
, a general practitioner and champion for Diabetes UK, as well as being a clinical research fellow in diabetes and senior lecturer at the University of Wolverhampton (England), agreed and tweeted: “Is there a hint of GLP-1 class effect?”
While another U.K. diabetes consultant,, a diabetes consultant and endocrinologist at Queen Alexandria Hospital, Portsmouth, England, tweeted: “Game-changer or confirmatory of class effect with better options available?”
The lack of a weight effect could be an advantage of course, Dr. Matthews observed; differences in the GLP-1 agonists could be matched to patients’ needs, with those you do not want to lose weight being given albiglutide.
In an editorial also published in the Lancet (2018 Oct 2.), and , who are both from the University of Oxford, observed that “given the clear cardiovascular benefit observed with albiglutide … GlaxoSmithKline should reconsider making it available to patients.”
Ms. Mafham and Dr. Preiss also noted in their comments that, while there has been inconsistency among GLP-1 trials, the HARMONY Outcomes data now add to the evidence of a cardiovascular benefit as seen in the SUSTAIN-6 trial with semaglutide and in the LEADER trial with liraglutide.
“International guidelines should reflect the increasing weight of evidence that supports the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease,” the editorialists wrote.
The study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Leiter was an investigator in the study and disclosed receiving research funding and honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi Aventis, as well as honoraria from Servier. Dr. Lepore is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Matthews disclosed acting as an advisory board member for and receiving consulting fees or honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Sanofi Aventis, Janssen, and Servier. Ms. Mafham has no competing interests. Dr. Preiss is an investigator in a trial funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.
SOURCE: Hernandez AF et al. Lancet. 2018 Oct 2. .