In psoriasis, low cholesterol efflux capacity may predict heart risk




Low cholesterol efflux capacity may be an important biomarker for subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in patients with psoriasis, based on findings from a prospective cohort study.

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) was inversely correlated with the noncalcified burden (NCB) of coronary atherosclerosis in baseline data from the first 101 patients enrolled in the 4-year study, Dr. Taufiq Salahuddin of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and colleagues reported online in the European Heart Journal.

The relationship between CEC and NCB “suggests that higher CEC may promote reverse cholesterol transport from earlier, more lipid-rich plaques. … Others have found this noncalcified plaque to be the culprit lesion in acute coronary syndromes. Therefore, in the context of our study, there is strong biological plausibility for observing a relationship between CEC and NCB; psoriasis is associated with both increased future cardiovascular events and impaired HDL function, and our findings suggest that this may be due to predisposition toward formation of noncalcified plaque,” the researchers wrote.

The relationship between CEC (quantified using a cell-based ex vivo assay), and NCB plaque indexes (assessed by quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography) persisted after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and apolipoprotein A1 levels.

Of note, the relationship between CEC and NCB was stronger in women than in men, with a statistically significant gender interaction, the investigators found (Eur Heart J. 2015 Jul 18.

Cholesterol efflux capacity has been shown in prior studies to predict future cardiovascular events, and since psoriasis both increases cardiovascular risk and impairs CEC, the investigators sought to assess the cross-sectional relationship between coronary plaque burden and CEC.

Study subjects were adults over age 18 years with moderate skin disease severity (median psoriasis area severity index [PASI] score, 6.2), and a low 10-year pooled cohort equation risk score (median, 2.7%). Traditional lipid profiles were within normal limits, and the median CEC was 0.94.

In addition to the inverse correlation between CEC and NCB at baseline, significant relationships were seen between CEC and PASI score, body surface area affected by psoriasis, and HDL cholesterol level, and between noncalcified burden and CEC, psoriasis severity, body surface area affected by psoriasis, and HDL cholesterol.

“Stratified by the sample’s median CEC value, patients with low CEC had greater total burden of coronary plaque and greater NCB than did patients with high CEC (0.0131 and 0.0127 mm2 in low CEC vs. 0.0106 and 0.0103 mm2 with high CEC),” they wrote.

No differences were seen based on psoriasis treatment status or statin use, although systemic/biologic therapy was associated with a reduction in noncalcified burden.

The findings with respect to gender differences may suggest that greater CEC is more protective against noncalcified plaque in women than it is in men, the investigators added, concluding that “ongoing follow-up of these patients will inform whether aggressive treatment of psoriasis and lifestyle measures improve CEC and ultimately noncalcified burden within the coronary arteries in psoriasis.”

This study was supported by a National Institutes of Health intramural grant, and the NIH Medical Research Scholars Program. The investigators reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Recommended Reading

Jury still out on effect of systemic psoriasis meds on MI risk
MDedge Cardiology
Chronic inflammatory disease patients at greater risk of major CV events
MDedge Cardiology
Framingham score underestimates CVD risk in psoriatic arthritis patients
MDedge Cardiology
WCD: Psoriasis plus depression magnifies MI risk
MDedge Cardiology
EULAR: Panel previews updated CVD recommendations
MDedge Cardiology