Reviews of Research on Health-Care Acquired Infections, Glucocorticoid Therapy in COPD, and Blood-Pressure Lowering in Intracerebral Hemorrhages

The Hospitalist. 2013 September;2013(09):

September 1, 2013|Breast Cancer ICYMI

Sameem Abedin, MD;Sarah Anand, MD;Julieann Grant, MD;Andrea Kim, MD;Mark McQuillan, MD;University Of Michigan Health System

Bottom line: Copper-surfaced objects reduce HAI rates in ICU patients.

Citation: Salgado CD, Sepkowitz, KA, John JF, et al. Copper surfaces reduce the rate of healthcare-acquired infections in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(5):479-486.

Glucocorticoid Therapy for Five Days Not Inferior to 14 Days for COPD Exacerbation

Clinical question: Do short-course glucocorticoids work as well as conventional long courses for COPD exacerbation?

Background: International guidelines advocate a seven- to 14-day treatment course with glucocorticoids for COPD exacerbation, but the optimal duration of treatment is not known, and there are potential risks associated with glucocorticoid exposure.

Study design: Randomized, noninferiority, multicenter trial.

Setting: Five Swiss teaching hospitals.

Synopsis: Three hundred fourteen patients presenting to the ED with acute COPD exacerbation and without a history of asthma were randomized to receive treatment with 40 mg prednisone daily for either five or 14 days in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded fashion. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of re-exacerbation within six months. Patients in the five-day glucocorticoid group compared with the 14-day group were exposed to significantly less glucocorticoid.

Bottom line: Treatment for five days with glucocorticoids was not inferior to 14 days for acute COPD exacerbations with regard to re-exacerbations within six months and resulted in less glucocorticoid exposure overall.

Citation: Leuppi JF, Schuetz P, Bingisser R, et al. Short-term vs. conventional glucocorticoid therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;390(21):2223-2231.

The proportion of patients that developed either an HAI and/or MRSA or VRE colonization was significantly lower among patients in rooms with the copper-surfaced items (0.071 vs. 0.128; P=0.02).

Patient Preference for Participation in Medical Decision-Making May Be Associated with Increased Resource Utilization

Clinical question: Do patient preferences for participation in medical decision-making affect health-care utilization?

Background: Patient participation in medical decision-making has been associated with improved patient satisfaction and health outcomes. There is little evidence to support theories that patient preferences might decrease or increase health-care utilization.

Study design: Survey study in academic research setting.

Setting: University of Chicago Medical Center.

Synopsis: More than 21,700 patients admitted to a general internal-medicine service completed a survey that included questions regarding preferences about receiving medical information and participation in medical decision-making. Survey data were linked with administrative data, including length of stay and total hospitalization costs.

Most patients (96.3%) expressed interest in receiving information about their illness and treatment options, but the majority of patients (71.1%) also expressed a preference to leave medical decision-making to their physician. Patients who preferred to participate in medical decision-making had significantly longer hospital LOS and higher total hospitalization cost.

Bottom line: Participation in medical decision-making significantly increased LOS and total costs.

Citation: Tak HJ, Ruhnke GW, Meltzer DO. Association of patient preferences for participation in decision making with length of stay and costs among hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(13):1195-1205. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6048.

Early Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Adults Does Not Significantly Affect Mortality or Infection Rates

Clinical question: Does providing early parenteral nutrition to critically ill adults with short-term relative contraindications to early enteral nutrition affect outcomes?

Background: The appropriate use of parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults is controversial. A systematic review found that critically ill patients randomized to receive early parenteral nutrition had significantly lower mortality but increased infection rates compared with standard care. A large-scale randomized trial was necessary to confirm the results.

Study design: Multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial.