News

S. aureus Rarely Transmitted From Mom to Baby


 

From the Eastern Society for Pediatric Research Annual Meeting

Major Finding: Maternal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus had no significant impact on the rate of S. aureus colonization in neonates.

Data Source: Review of 2,789 infants born to 2,702 women in New York during 2009.

Disclosures: Dr. Top and Dr. Saiman said they had no relevant financial disclosures.

PHILADELPHIA – Neonates do not face an increased risk of colonization or infection by Staphylococcus aureus when they are born to mothers who have anovaginal colonization with this pathogen, based on a review of more than 2,700 deliveries.

The low 1% rate of transmission of S. aureus from colonized mothers to their children precludes the need to routinely screen pregnant women for anovaginal S. aureus colonization, Dr. Karina A. Top said. “Maternal anovaginal S. aureus colonization may be a risk factor for maternal infections, but it does not appear to be associated with neonatal infections,” said Dr. Top, a pediatric infectious disease physician at Columbia University and New York-Presbyterian Hospital in New York.

“People have been saying that maybe we should culture pregnant women” to determine whether they have anovaginal S. aureus colonization, “but it's a huge expense, and you'd have to really convince yourself that it matters,” said Dr. Lisa Saiman, a professor of clinical pediatrics at the university and a collaborator on the study. “S. aureus is normal flora. If there is a skin break it can lead to infection, but usually not. You don't want people to worry about what's normal. The message [from these results] is that there is no role for routine screening of pregnant women and neonates, because these are normal flora” she said in an interview.

This is the first study to systematically look at mother-to-neonate transmission of S. aureus, she added.

The current analysis is based on a prior study by Dr. Top of 2,921 pregnant woman in New York during 2009 that found colonization with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) in 345 women (12%) and colonization with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in 18 women (0.6%). Dr. Top and her associates collected specimens from these women at 35–37 weeks' gestation. Subsequently, 2,702 of these women delivered an infant, resulting in 2,789 live births.

Collection and analysis of specimens from the infants during their first 3 months of life revealed 10 cases of definite S. aureus infection in the neonates, 8 cases of probable infection, and 7 cases of S. aureus colonization. Dr. Top's analysis showed a 1.1% rate of neonatal infection or colonization in babies born to colonized mothers, and a 0.9% rate in those born to uncolonized mothers, a difference that was not significant. The median age for the first positive S. aureus culture in these infants occurred at 27 days.

Delivery mode, cesarean or vaginal, had no significant impact on S. aureus transmission to the infants, but three other variables did significantly link with an increased rate of positive cultures: preterm birth (less than 37 weeks), multiple gestations, and admission to the neonatal ICU. Each of these three factors increased the rate of S. aureus colonization by 6- to 17-fold. In contrast, maternal colonization had a statistically significant impact on the rate of maternal infection with S. aureus following delivery. Colonized women had a 2.1% rate of postpartum infection, more than threefold higher than the rate in uncolonized women. Women who had a caesarean delivery were significantly more likely to become infected than women with a vaginal delivery.

The low 1% transmission rate from colonized mothers to their children precludes the need to screen pregnant women.

Source DR. TOP

Next Article: