The Top 100 Cited Articles in Clinical Orthopedic Sports Medicine
Orthopedic sports medicine continues to evolve, owing much of its clinical management and practice to rigorous academic research. In this review, we identify and describe the top 100 cited articles in clinical sports medicine and recognize the authors and institutions driving the research.
We collected articles (excluding basic science, animal, and cadaveric studies) from the 25 highest-impact sports medicine journals and analyzed them by number of citations, journal, publication date, institution, country, topic, and author.
Mean number of citations was 408 (range, 229-1629). The articles were published in 7 journals, most in the 1980s to 2000s, and represented 15 countries. Thirty topics were addressed, with a heavy emphasis on anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction, knee rating systems, rotator cuff reconstruction, and chondrocyte transplantation. The 3 most cited articles, by Insall and colleagues, Constant and Murley, and Tegner and Lysholm, addressed a knee, a shoulder, and another knee rating system, respectively. Several authors contributed multiple articles. The Hospital for Special Surgery and the University of Bern contributed the most articles (5 each).
This study provides a comprehensive list of the past century’s major academic contributions to sports medicine. Residents and fellows may use this list to guide their scholarly investigations.
In several cases, an author contributed more than 1 classic article. In fact, 31 of the top 100 articles were by an individual who had coauthored 2 or more of the publications on this list. The researchers with the largest number of first-authored articles were Noyes88-92 (5 articles), Neer81-84 (4 articles), and Rowe,102-104 Daniel,35-37 Peterson,97-99 and Hewett52-54 (3 articles each) (Table 417,19,21-24,29-31,35-37,42,44,45,52-54,58,61-65,69,70,72,74,80-84,87-92,97-99,101-105,107,109,110,113). Articles from authors with multiple publications had a common topic.
Last, these articles originated from a number of different countries and institutions. Of the 15 source countries (Figure 2), the United States contributed the most (61 articles). Other countries had prominent representation: Sweden and Switzerland (8 each), United Kingdom (5), and Canada, France, and Norway (3 each). These articles originated from 69 universities, hospitals, and clinics; 21 institutions had 2 or more articles (Table 5). The 5 institutions with the highest number of articles were Hospital for Special Surgery, University of Bern, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons/Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, Cincinnati Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, and Massachusetts General Hospital.
Discussion
Several trends can be ascertained from analyzing the top 100 clinical articles cited in sports medicine. The 5 most frequent topics discussed were ACL injury and reconstruction, knee rating systems for injury and function, rotator cuff reconstruction, chondrocyte transplantation, and femoroacetabular impingement (Table 3). Of those 5 topics, only ACL injury and reconstruction falls within the top 10 most common orthopedic surgical procedures performed in the United States reported by one analysis.114 The most common orthopedic surgical procedure, knee arthroscopy, ranks 10th of all topics covered by the top 100 articles, whereas the second most common procedure, shoulder arthroscopy, was not discussed by any of those 100 articles. Also notable is the high frequency of knee rating system studies, which correlates well with the fact that 4 of the most common orthopedic surgical procedures are knee procedures. The prevalence of rating system articles reflects the importance of and need for accurate methods in the diagnosis of injuries in sports medicine.
The most cited sports medicine article was written by Insall and colleagues62 in 1989, more than 2 decades ago. In this article, “Rationale of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System,” they reported on a rigorous system that rates knee function and ability to walk and climb stairs. The second most cited article, “A Clinical Method of Functional Assessment of the Shoulder,” was written in 1987 by Constant and Murley.32 This article discusses another rating system but offers a functional assessment of the shoulder that is highly reproducible and time-efficient. “Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries,” the third most cited article, was written in 1985 by Tegner and Lysholm.113 This article details the complexities and variable uses of different knee ligament injury rating systems. These top 3 articles were all published in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. In addition, all 3 discussed rating systems, reinforcing the need for accurate scoring systems to standardize the diagnosis of injury across the field of orthopedics and qualify outcomes after injury.
A number of studies have introduced physical examination findings, clinical tests, and rating systems used in the clinical setting of sports medicine (and named after the contributing authors). For example, the Neer sign82 and the Hawkins-Kennedy test51 are used to determine shoulder impingement. In knee ligament injuries, the Tegner knee activity score113 complements other functional scores (eg, Lysholm knee score74). For grading joint cartilage breakdown, the Outerbridge classification system96 is commonly used. The Fairbank test39 is used to gauge knee instability. In evaluating fatty degeneration of rotator cuff muscles through computed tomography scans, the Goutallier classification47 is used. Other metrics, such as the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, introduced by Roos and colleagues,101 measure knee injury and osteoarthritis. In other scenarios, studies have improved on surgical techniques—for example, the Neer open modification84 of the Bankart procedure. Many of these rating systems and named clinical findings are so ingrained in the practice and vernacular of orthopedics that it is possible they are in fact undercited in the literature.
As in other bibliometric analyses, one concession made here was to credit the first author listed for making the primary contribution to an article. As a result of journal variability and inconsistency, we were precluded from analyzing senior authors. When analyzed for authorship at any position, 3 of the top authors (Table 4) showed contributions to additional articles in the top 100 list. Noyes was listed as last author on 2 other articles,52,54 raising his total to 7. Daniel was listed as second author on 1 additional article,105 and Beck was listed as third author on 1 other article,42 raising their totals to 4 and 3, respectively.
