ADVERTISEMENT

Targeting a New Safe Zone: A Step in the Development of Patient-Specific Component Positioning for Total Hip Arthroplasty

The American Journal of Orthopedics. 2015 June;44(6):270-276
Author and Disclosure Information

Surgeons often target the Lewinnek zone, with its mean (SD) inclination of 40° (10°) and mean (SD) anteversion of 15° (10°), for acetabular orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, matching native anteversion (20°-25°) may achieve optimal stability.

We conducted a study in a large single-surgeon patient cohort to determine the incidence of early postoperative dislocation with increased acetabular anteversion and the accuracy of imageless navigation in achieving target acetabular position. Soft-tissue repair through a posterolateral approach was performed in 553 THAs that met the inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) target acetabular orientation was 40° (10°) of inclination and 25° (10°) of anteversion. Software was used to measure acetabular positioning on postoperative radiographs. Incidence of dislocation within 6 months after surgery was determined.

Mean (SD) inclination was 42.2° (4.9°), and mean (SD) anteversion was 23.9° (6.5°). Approximately 82% of cups were placed in the target zone. Variation in anteversion accounted for 67.3% of outliers. Only body mass index was associated with inclination outside the target range (P = .017), and only female sex was associated with anteversion outside the target range (P = .030). Six THAs (1.1%) experienced early dislocation, and 3 (0.54%) of these were revised for multiple dislocations. There was no relationship between dislocation and component placement in either the Lewinnek zone (P = .224) or the target zone (P = .287).

Our study results suggested that increasing target acetabular anteversion to 25° may reduce the incidence of early postoperative instability relative to rates reported in the literature. Despite the higher accuracy of component placement with an imageless navigation system, dislocations occurred in patients with acetabular components positioned in our target zone and in the historical safe zone. These dislocations support the notion that there likely is no absolute safe range for acetabular component positioning, as THA stability depends on many factors. Ideal targets for implant orientation for acetabulum and femur may be patient-specific.16,19 Investigators should prospectively evaluate patient-specific THA component positioning and determine its effect on postoperative dislocation and bearing-surface wear. As specific implant targets are further defined, tools that are more precise and accurate than conventional techniques will be needed to achieve goal component positioning. Our study results confirmed that imageless navigation is an accurate method for achieving acetabular orientation targets.