ADVERTISEMENT

I'm Sorry

The Hospitalist. 2006 June;2006(06):

Bridging the Gap

Dr. Barnett, who practices hospital medicine part-time along with his major focus in addiction medicine, was formerly the director of the UNM hospitalist team. He explains that one of the primary reasons hospitalists may need to apologize to patients is that the hospitalist and patient have no prior relationship that could serve as a foundation for interpreting each other’s behavior.8

He believes apologizing for the delays and inconveniences that happen in the hospital “can help bridge the relationship gap in hospital medicine. Because what people believe about their primary care physicians is that they know and care about them,” he says. “To minimize their anxiety about you, show them that you do care about them by getting to know them well, and apology is the one of the best ways of doing that.”

When asked to elaborate what he means by “getting to know them well,” Dr. Barnett says, “I might tell someone, ‘I’d like to get to know you better; what can you tell me about yourself that would help bring me up to speed?’” It’s open-ended, he says, and you let the patient choose the topic. “Most people will say something. … It’s empathic inquiry with really good reflective listening; that is probably the simplest way of summarizing what it takes.”

Dr. Barnett suggests this kind of inquiry can mitigate the gaps in relationships that may lead to misunderstandings, edgy situations, and errors that may later call for apology. He recommends asking or saying some of the following to patients:

  • What do you know about your illness?
  • What do you believe about your illness?
  • What are your feelings, values, beliefs, and preferences about/for your treatment?
  • What can you tell me about your experiences in the hospital?

For patients who have been ill many times and have had a lot of medical experience, you could ask:

  • Could you tell me about your doctors?
  • What do you like about doctors?
  • What don’t you like about your doctors?

These questions can help you discern who they are as a patient, and it gives patients the opportunity to be candid with you.

“It’s not about finding information that’s embarrassing or critical to your predecessor physicians, but it allows you to not make the same mistakes inadvertently,” says Dr. Barnett, who considers it concrete information. “I want them to have good medical care. I don’t want to make them unhappy. I want to avoid pitfalls. I think the two of us—the patient and I—should avoid pitfalls together.”

Asking the patient in a straightforward way what they want and don’t want gives the patient an opportunity to give the physician advice on how to stay out of trouble with them.

The Lexington VA’s Apology Lesson

Historically, the Lexington (Ky.) Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital’s approach to medical errors was an adversarial one. In 1987, however, after two malpractice verdicts resulted in total payouts of $1.5 million, the hospital implemented a policy of proactively assuming responsibility for its mistakes. From 1990-1996, the hospital paid an average of only $190,113 per year in malpractice claims; the average claim was $15,622. Their malpractice payments went to the lowest quartile of 36 comparable VA hospitals and to the bottom sixth in terms of average payment per claim.11,12

The Lexington VA’s use of apology was also seen to promote the well-being of its patients, its employee morale, and its reputation as a humane institution. In general, businesses that include responsibility and apology as tools for maintaining their integrity ensure less risk. Such a philosophy also leads to greater reporting of errors, which in turn can lead to better identifying and correcting systemic and individual risks. Most patients who are harmed by medical errors want primarily three things: an explanation of what happened, an apology from the person responsible, and an assurance that things have been changed in some way to prevent harm to other patients in the future.—AS