Letters To The Editor

In reply: Menstrual manipulation

Author and Disclosure Information



In Reply: Thank you for reading our article. Although the focus was geared more toward a comparison of different means of menstrual manipulation, we appreciate your comments on oral contraceptives and the link to premenopausal breast cancer.

As you noted, oral contraceptives have been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, both in your meta-analysis 1 and again more recently in a prospective study of 116,608 female nurses from 25 to 42 years of age. 2 Interestingly, data from the latter study suggested that different formulations of oral contraceptives may pose different risks, and specifically that the use of triphasic preparations with levonorgestrel as the progestin had the highest risk. However, there is otherwise a paucity of data regarding the risk of specific formulations. There is currently no evidence of an association between oral contraceptive use and death from breast cancer, nor is there evidence that longer use of an oral contraceptive increases one’s risk of death from breast cancer. 3

Oral contraceptives have also been associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer, 4 and they appear to protect against death from ovarian cancer and uterine cancer. 3 Therefore, the clinician must consider the individual patient before making treatment recommendations, taking into account personal risk factors and other health concerns. (For a full list of contraindications to oral contraceptives, please refer to Table 2 in our original article.) Further guidelines may also be obtained from the “US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use 2010,” issued by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in May 2010, 5 which delineates the eligibility criteria for initiating and continuing specific contraceptive methods, including oral contraceptives.

Thank you again for sharing your concerns. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify this important point.

Next Article:

Proton pump inhibitor side effects and drug interactions: Much ado about nothing?

Related Articles